lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bB9M05UKfvu66_wMK1u_HBvRws4R0KxPgTu4vPdKuGy9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Apr 2021 12:28:42 -0400
From:   Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        kexec mailing list <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, steve.capper@....com,
        rfontana@...hat.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Selin Dag <selindag@...il.com>,
        Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 03/18] arm64: hyp-stub: Move el1_sync into the vectors

> > Thank you for noticing this. Not sure how this missmerge happened. I
> > have added the missing case, and VHE is initialized correctly during
> > boot.
> > [   14.698175] kvm [1]: VHE mode initialized successfully
> >
> > During normal boot, kexec reboot, and kdump reboot. I will respin the
> > series and send the version 14 soon.
>
> Please give people a chance to review this lot first. This isn't code
> that is easy to digest, and immediate re-spinning does more harm than
> good (this isn't targeting 5.13, I would assume).
>

There are people who are testing this series, this is why I wanted to
respin. But, I will wait for review comments before sending the next
version. In the meantime I will send a fixed version of this patch as
a reply to this thread instead.

Thanks,
Pasha

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ