linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] ASoC: tas2764: constify static struct snd_soc_dai

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <161790012551.16915.4640106834409822350.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu,  8 Apr 2021 17:54:40 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ASoC: tas2764: constify static struct snd_soc_dai_ops

On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 14:26:43 +0800, Ye Bin wrote:
> The snd_soc_dai_ops structures is only stored in the ops field of a
> snd_soc_dai_driver structure, so make the snd_soc_dai_ops structure
> const to allow the compiler to put it in read-only memory.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: tas2764: constify static struct snd_soc_dai_ops
      commit: b186e7c17d9f2c2bc9cd0bd362402eddbea7749b

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark