[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB47730AA300DB8DBE08E74FEEBA749@OSBPR01MB4773.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 18:01:42 +0000
From: Min Li <min.li.xe@...esas.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "derek.kiernan@...inx.com" <derek.kiernan@...inx.com>,
"dragan.cvetic@...inx.com" <dragan.cvetic@...inx.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] misc: Add Renesas Synchronization
Management Unit (SMU) support
>
> That does not make sense, this is only one kernel module, with one .h file in
> this patch, I do not see those other files you are talking about...
>
> And if you have named registers that are identical, and yet you only work on
> one device, that feels like a design flaw somewhere :)
>
Hi Greg, the register files are in the 1/2 patch for the mfd part of the change.
The reason they have same named register is because they are all synchronization
devices and they share some similar features
Powered by blists - more mailing lists