linux-kernel - Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kbuild: add support for zstd compressed modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210408210448.1850553-1-lucjan.lucjanov@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu,  8 Apr 2021 23:04:47 +0200
From:   Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@...il.com>
To:     lucjan.lucjanov@...il.com
Cc:     linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        masahiroy@...nel.org, oleksandr@...alenko.name,
        sedat.dilek@...il.com
Subject: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kbuild: add support for zstd compressed modules

No, the --rm option is essential. xz and gzip have the --rm option built in as opposed to zstd, which is why I used it. I've been using zstd module compression since last december (although I set a different compression level on mine) and everything works fine. Oleksandr also tested it at his place and didn't report any objections.