linux-kernel - Re: OT: Processor recommendation for RAID6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAMCDecxjX5d20Ra7PVgsSM6xg3f2D5q=-x3eeFosfFfnbJxbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Apr 2021 19:12:29 -0500
From:   Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@...il.com>
To:     Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Cc:     Linux RAID <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, it+linux-raid@...gen.mpg.de
Subject: Re: OT: Processor recommendation for RAID6

I ran some tests on a 4 intel socket box with files in tmpfs (gold
6152 I think) and with the files interleaved 4way (I think) got the
same speeds you got on your intels (roughly) with defaults.

I also tested on my 6 core/4500u ryzen and got almost the same
speed(slightly slower) as on your large ryzen boxes with many numa
nodes, so it has to be effectively only using a single numa node and a
single cpu.

I did test my 4500u ryzen machine with fewer cores enabled,  1 core
got 18M, 2 cores got 23M, and 3 got 32M so it did not appear scale
past 3 cores.

I also testing on an ancient a8-5600k and was almost the same speed as
the ryzen.

>From the calls there must be a lot of reading memory.   And I got the
same speed using shm, using tmpfs, using tmpfs+hugepages and using
files on a disk that should have been in file cache.