[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210408081935.b3xollrzl6lejbyf@wittgenstein>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:19:35 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
To: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com, jolsa@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
yhs@...com, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC bpf-next 1/1] bpf: Introduce iter_pagecache
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:46:11PM -0700, Daniel Xu wrote:
> This commit introduces the bpf page cache iterator. This iterator allows
> users to run a bpf prog against each page in the "page cache".
> Internally, the "page cache" is extremely tied to VFS superblock + inode
> combo. Because of this, iter_pagecache will only examine pages in the
> caller's mount namespace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/Makefile | 2 +-
> kernel/bpf/pagecache_iter.c | 293 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 294 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 kernel/bpf/pagecache_iter.c
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/Makefile b/kernel/bpf/Makefile
> index 7f33098ca63f..3deb6a8d3f75 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ cflags-nogcse-$(CONFIG_X86)$(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) := -fno-gcse
> endif
> CFLAGS_core.o += $(call cc-disable-warning, override-init) $(cflags-nogcse-yy)
>
> -obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += syscall.o verifier.o inode.o helpers.o tnum.o bpf_iter.o map_iter.o task_iter.o prog_iter.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += syscall.o verifier.o inode.o helpers.o tnum.o bpf_iter.o pagecache_iter.o map_iter.o task_iter.o prog_iter.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += hashtab.o arraymap.o percpu_freelist.o bpf_lru_list.o lpm_trie.o map_in_map.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += local_storage.o queue_stack_maps.o ringbuf.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += bpf_local_storage.o bpf_task_storage.o
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/pagecache_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/pagecache_iter.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8442ab0d4221
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/pagecache_iter.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,293 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/* Copyright (c) 2021 Facebook */
> +
> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include <linux/btf_ids.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/mm_types.h>
> +#include <linux/mnt_namespace.h>
> +#include <linux/nsproxy.h>
> +#include <linux/pagemap.h>
> +#include <linux/radix-tree.h>
> +#include <linux/seq_file.h>
> +#include "../../fs/mount.h"
This is a private header on purpose. Outside of fs/ poking around in
struct mount or struct mount_namespace should not be done.
> +
> +struct bpf_iter_seq_pagecache_info {
> + struct mnt_namespace *ns;
> + struct radix_tree_root superblocks;
> + struct super_block *cur_sb;
> + struct inode *cur_inode;
> + unsigned long cur_page_idx;
> +};
> +
> +static struct super_block *goto_next_sb(struct bpf_iter_seq_pagecache_info *info)
> +{
> + struct super_block *sb = NULL;
> + struct radix_tree_iter iter;
> + void **slot;
> +
> + radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &info->superblocks, &iter,
> + ((unsigned long)info->cur_sb + 1)) {
> + sb = (struct super_block *)iter.index;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + info->cur_sb = sb;
> + info->cur_inode = NULL;
> + info->cur_page_idx = 0;
> + return sb;
> +}
> +
> +static bool inode_unusual(struct inode *inode) {
> + return ((inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE|I_NEW)) ||
> + (inode->i_mapping->nrpages == 0));
> +}
> +
> +static struct inode *goto_next_inode(struct bpf_iter_seq_pagecache_info *info)
> +{
> + struct inode *prev_inode = info->cur_inode;
> + struct inode *inode;
> +
> +retry:
> + BUG_ON(!info->cur_sb);
> + spin_lock(&info->cur_sb->s_inode_list_lock);
> +
> + if (!info->cur_inode) {
> + list_for_each_entry(inode, &info->cur_sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
> + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> + if (inode_unusual(inode)) {
> + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> + continue;
> + }
> + __iget(inode);
> + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> + info->cur_inode = inode;
> + break;
> + }
> + } else {
> + inode = info->cur_inode;
> + info->cur_inode = NULL;
> + list_for_each_entry_continue(inode, &info->cur_sb->s_inodes,
> + i_sb_list) {
> + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> + if (inode_unusual(inode)) {
> + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> + continue;
> + }
> + __iget(inode);
> + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> + info->cur_inode = inode;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* Seen all inodes in this superblock */
> + if (!info->cur_inode) {
> + spin_unlock(&info->cur_sb->s_inode_list_lock);
> + if (!goto_next_sb(info)) {
> + inode = NULL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + goto retry;
> + }
> +
> + spin_unlock(&info->cur_sb->s_inode_list_lock);
> + info->cur_page_idx = 0;
> +out:
> + iput(prev_inode);
> + return info->cur_inode;
> +}
> +
> +static struct page *goto_next_page(struct bpf_iter_seq_pagecache_info *info)
> +{
> + struct page *page, *ret = NULL;
> + unsigned long idx;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> +retry:
> + BUG_ON(!info->cur_inode);
> + ret = NULL;
> + xa_for_each_start(&info->cur_inode->i_data.i_pages, idx, page,
> + info->cur_page_idx) {
> + if (!page_cache_get_speculative(page))
> + continue;
> +
> + ret = page;
> + info->cur_page_idx = idx + 1;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (!ret) {
> + /* Seen all inodes and superblocks */
> + if (!goto_next_inode(info))
> + goto out;
> +
> + goto retry;
> + }
> +
> +out:
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void *pagecache_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
> +{
> + struct bpf_iter_seq_pagecache_info *info = seq->private;
> + struct page *page;
> +
> + if (!info->cur_sb && !goto_next_sb(info))
> + return NULL;
> + if (!info->cur_inode && !goto_next_inode(info))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + page = goto_next_page(info);
> + if (!page)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (*pos == 0)
> + ++*pos;
> +
> + return page;
> +
> +}
> +
> +static void *pagecache_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
> +{
> + struct bpf_iter_seq_pagecache_info *info = seq->private;
> + struct page *page;
> +
> + ++*pos;
> + put_page((struct page *)v);
> + page = goto_next_page(info);
> + if (!page)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return page;
> +}
> +
> +struct bpf_iter__pagecache {
> + __bpf_md_ptr(struct bpf_iter_meta *, meta);
> + __bpf_md_ptr(struct page *, page);
> +};
> +
> +DEFINE_BPF_ITER_FUNC(pagecache, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta, struct page *page)
> +
> +static int __pagecache_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, struct page *page,
> + bool in_stop)
> +{
> + struct bpf_iter_meta meta;
> + struct bpf_iter__pagecache ctx;
> + struct bpf_prog *prog;
> +
> + meta.seq = seq;
> + prog = bpf_iter_get_info(&meta, in_stop);
> + if (!prog)
> + return 0;
> +
> + meta.seq = seq;
> + ctx.meta = &meta;
> + ctx.page = page;
> + return bpf_iter_run_prog(prog, &ctx);
> +}
> +
> +static int pagecache_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> +{
> + return __pagecache_seq_show(seq, v, false);
> +}
> +
> +static void pagecache_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> +{
> + (void)__pagecache_seq_show(seq, v, true);
> + if (v)
> + put_page((struct page *)v);
> +}
> +
> +static int init_seq_pagecache(void *priv_data, struct bpf_iter_aux_info *aux)
> +{
> + struct bpf_iter_seq_pagecache_info *info = priv_data;
> + struct radix_tree_iter iter;
> + struct super_block *sb;
> + struct mount *mnt;
> + void **slot;
> + int err;
> +
> + info->ns = current->nsproxy->mnt_ns;
> + get_mnt_ns(info->ns);
> + INIT_RADIX_TREE(&info->superblocks, GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + spin_lock(&info->ns->ns_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(mnt, &info->ns->list, mnt_list) {
Not just are there helpers for taking ns_lock
static inline void lock_ns_list(struct mnt_namespace *ns)
static inline void unlock_ns_list(struct mnt_namespace *ns)
they are private to fs/namespace.c because it's the only place that
should ever walk this list.
This seems buggy: why is it ok here to only take ns_lock and not also
namespace_sem like mnt_already_visible() and __is_local_mountpoint() or
the relevant proc iterators? I might be missing something.
> + sb = mnt->mnt.mnt_sb;
> +
> + /* The same mount may be mounted in multiple places */
> + if (radix_tree_lookup(&info->superblocks, (unsigned long)sb))
> + continue;
> +
> + err = radix_tree_insert(&info->superblocks,
> + (unsigned long)sb, (void *)1);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &info->superblocks, &iter, 0) {
> + sb = (struct super_block *)iter.index;
> + atomic_inc(&sb->s_active);
It also isn't nice that you mess with sb->s_active directly.
Imho, this is poking around in a lot of fs/ specific stuff that other
parts of the kernel should not care about or have access to.
Christian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists