[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f89f694f-d472-3287-51aa-86258e107361@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 11:01:57 +0200
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/27] mm: Introduce struct folio
On 31/03/2021 20.47, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> +static inline void folio_build_bug(void)
> +{
> +#define FOLIO_MATCH(pg, fl) \
> +BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct page, pg) != offsetof(struct folio, fl));
> +
> + FOLIO_MATCH(flags, flags);
> + FOLIO_MATCH(lru, lru);
> + FOLIO_MATCH(mapping, mapping);
> + FOLIO_MATCH(index, index);
> + FOLIO_MATCH(private, private);
> + FOLIO_MATCH(_mapcount, _mapcount);
> + FOLIO_MATCH(_refcount, _refcount);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> + FOLIO_MATCH(memcg_data, memcg_data);
> +#endif
> +#undef FOLIO_MATCH
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct page) != sizeof(struct folio));
> +}
> +
Perhaps do this next to the definition of struct folio instead of hiding
it in some arbitrary TU - hint, we have static_assert() that doesn't
need to be in function context. And consider amending FOLIO_MATCH by a
static_assert(__same_type(typeof_member(...), typeof_member(...))).
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists