[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d9a07c8d29c04d91d9fdf2946c54f8c9f107fb26.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:06:21 +0000
From: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To: "andy.shevchenko@...il.com" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC: "agross@...nel.org" <agross@...nel.org>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-power <linux-power@...rohmeurope.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/8] regulator: IRQ based event/error notification
helpers
On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 12:58 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 11:21 AM Matti Vaittinen
> <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com> wrote:
> > Hello Andy,
> >
> > On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 16:21 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 1:04 PM Matti Vaittinen
> > > <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com> wrote:
> > > > Provide helper function for IC's implementing regulator
> > > > notifications
> > > > when an IRQ fires. The helper also works for IRQs which can not
> > > > be
> > > > acked.
> > > > Helper can be set to disable the IRQ at handler and then re-
> > > > enabling it
> > > > on delayed work later. The helper also adds
> > > > regulator_get_error_flags()
> > > > errors in cache for the duration of IRQ disabling.
> > >
> > > Thanks for an update, my comments below. After addressing them,
> > > feel
> > > free to add
> > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> >
> > I (eventually) disagreed with couple of points here and haven't
> > changed
> > those. Please see list below.
> >
> > I still do think you did a really good job reviewing this - and you
> > should get the recognition from that work. Thus I'd nevertheless
> > would
> > like to add your Reviewed-by to the next version. Please let me
> > know if
> > you think it's ok. (I have the v7 ready but I'll wait until the
> > next
> > Monday before sending it to see if this brings more discussion).
>
> Looks OK to me.
> Just rename die_loudly() to rdev_die_loudly()
I did that. Thanks.
> and in any way of
> conditionals with that, please mark it with __noreturn attribute, so
> if (bla bla bla)
> rdev_die_loudly();
>
> will be an understandable trap.
Valid point. Will do, thanks again.
Best Regards
Matti Vaittinen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists