[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0049152ce9da85c50fda91c1b77ca233ba0fef3d.camel@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 13:34:12 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] USB: cdc-acm: fix TIOCGSERIAL implementation
Am Donnerstag, den 08.04.2021, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Johan Hovold:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:36:46AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 07.04.2021, 12:28 +0200 schrieb Johan Hovold:
> > Well, the devices report it. It is part of the standard.
>
> No, the standard doesn't include anything about a baud-base clock
> AFAICT.
Unfortunately it does.
dwDTERate - chapter 6.3.11 - table 17
If we does this wrongly, we should certainly fix it, but just removing
the reporting doesn't look right to me.
Regards
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists