lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:25:50 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@...m.it>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] net: pch: fix and a few cleanups

On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 09:57:12AM +0000, Flavio Suligoi wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 07:34:07PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > The series provides one fix (patch 1) for GPIO to be able to wait for
> > > > > the GPIO driver to appear. This is separated from the conversion to
> > > > > the GPIO descriptors (patch 2) in order to have a possibility for
> > > > > backporting. Patches 3 and 4 fix a minor warnings from Sparse while
> > > > > moving to a new APIs. Patch 5 is MODULE_VERSION() clean up.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tested on Intel Minnowboard (v1).
> > > >
> > > > Anything should I do here?
> > >
> > > it's ok for me
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > Who may apply them?
> 
> I used your patches on kernel net-next 5.12.0-rc2, on a board with an
> Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU E640   @ 1.00GHz and an EG20T PCH.
> I used the built-in OKI gigabit ethernet controller:
> 
> 02:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Platform Controller Hub EG20T Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 02)
> 	Kernel driver in use: pch_gbe
> 
> with a simple iperf test and all works fine:

> I hope this can help you.

> Tested-by: Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@...m.it>

Thank you, Flavio, very much!

Jesse, Jakub, David. can this be applied, please?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ