[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lf9syjmk.fsf@yhuang6-desk1.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 21:46:11 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Peter Xu" <peterx@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Arjun Roy <arjunroy@...gle.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V2] NUMA balancing: reduce TLB flush via delaying
mapping on hint page fault
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:27:17PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
>> With NUMA balancing, in hint page fault handler, the faulting page
>> will be migrated to the accessing node if necessary. During the
>> migration, TLB will be shot down on all CPUs that the process has run
>> on recently. Because in the hint page fault handler, the PTE will be
>> made accessible before the migration is tried. The overhead of TLB
>> shooting down can be high, so it's better to be avoided if possible.
>> In fact, if we delay mapping the page until migration, that can be
>> avoided. This is what this patch doing.
>>
>> <SNIP>
>>
>
> Thanks, I think this is ok for Andrew to pick up to see if anything
> bisects to this commit but it's a low risk.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
>
> More notes;
>
> This is not a universal win given that not all workloads exhibit the
> pattern where accesses occur in parallel threads between when a page
> is marked accessible and when it is migrated. The impact of the patch
> appears to be neutral for those workloads. For workloads that do exhibit
> the pattern, there is a small gain with a reduction in interrupts as
> advertised unlike v1 of the patch. Further tests are running to confirm
> the reduction is in TLB shootdown interrupts but I'm reasonably confident
> that will be the case. Gains are typically small and the load described in
> the changelog appears to be a best case scenario but a 1-5% gain in some
> other workloads is still an improvement. There is still the possibility
> that some workloads will unnecessarily stall as a result of the patch
> for slightly longer periods of time but that is a relatively low risk
> and will be difficult to detect. If I'm wrong, a bisection will find it.
Hi, Mel,
Thanks!
Hi, Andrew,
I found that V2 cannot apply on top of latest mmotm, so I send V3 as
follows. In case you need it.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210408132236.1175607-1-ying.huang@intel.com/
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists