[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YG8YSPHMBbBJadvp@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 17:50:48 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@...el.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
Tianshu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@...el.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] software node: Free resources explicitly when
swnode_register() fails
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 04:15:37PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 1:06 PM Heikki Krogerus
> <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 06:12:02PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Currently we have a slightly twisted logic in swnode_register().
> > > It frees resources that it doesn't allocate on error path and
> > > in once case it relies on the ->release() implementation.
> > >
> > > Untwist the logic by freeing resources explicitly when swnode_register()
> > > fails. Currently it happens only in fwnode_create_software_node().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > It all looks OK to me. FWIW, for the whole series:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Whole series applied (with some minor changelog edits) as 5.13 material, thanks!
It seems Greg applied it already. Was it dropped there?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists