lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210408151837.GB37165@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>
Date:   Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:18:37 +0100
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mte: Move MTE TCF0 check in entry-common

Hi Vincenzo,

On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 03:37:23PM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> The check_mte_async_tcf macro sets the TIF flag non-atomically. This can
> race with another CPU doing a set_tsk_thread_flag() and the flag can be
> lost in the process.
> 
> Move the tcf0 check to enter_from_user_mode() and clear tcf0 in
> exit_to_user_mode() to address the problem.

Beware that these are called at critical points of the entry sequence,
so we need to take care that nothing is instrumented (e.g. we can only
safely use noinstr functions here).

> Note: Moving the check in entry-common allows to use set_thread_flag()
> which is safe.
> 
> Fixes: 637ec831ea4f ("arm64: mte: Handle synchronous and asynchronous
> tag check faults")
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Reported-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h     |  8 ++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c |  6 ++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S        | 30 ------------------------------
>  arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c          | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h
> index 9b557a457f24..188f778c6f7b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ void mte_invalidate_tags(int type, pgoff_t offset);
>  void mte_invalidate_tags_area(int type);
>  void *mte_allocate_tag_storage(void);
>  void mte_free_tag_storage(char *storage);
> +void check_mte_async_tcf0(void);
> +void clear_mte_async_tcf0(void);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_MTE
>  
> @@ -83,6 +85,12 @@ static inline int mte_ptrace_copy_tags(struct task_struct *child,
>  {
>  	return -EIO;
>  }
> +void check_mte_async_tcf0(void)
> +{
> +}
> +void clear_mte_async_tcf0(void)
> +{
> +}

Were these meant to be static inline?

>  static inline void mte_assign_mem_tag_range(void *addr, size_t size)
>  {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> index 9d3588450473..837d3624a1d5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> @@ -289,10 +289,16 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr enter_from_user_mode(void)
>  	CT_WARN_ON(ct_state() != CONTEXT_USER);
>  	user_exit_irqoff();
>  	trace_hardirqs_off_finish();
> +
> +	/* Check for asynchronous tag check faults in user space */
> +	check_mte_async_tcf0();
>  }
>  
>  asmlinkage void noinstr exit_to_user_mode(void)
>  {
> +	/* Ignore asynchronous tag check faults in the uaccess routines */
> +	clear_mte_async_tcf0();
> +
>  	trace_hardirqs_on_prepare();
>  	lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(CALLER_ADDR0);
>  	user_enter_irqoff();
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> index a31a0a713c85..fafd74ae5021 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -147,32 +147,6 @@ alternative_cb_end
>  .L__asm_ssbd_skip\@:
>  	.endm
>  
> -	/* Check for MTE asynchronous tag check faults */
> -	.macro check_mte_async_tcf, flgs, tmp
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_MTE
> -alternative_if_not ARM64_MTE
> -	b	1f
> -alternative_else_nop_endif
> -	mrs_s	\tmp, SYS_TFSRE0_EL1
> -	tbz	\tmp, #SYS_TFSR_EL1_TF0_SHIFT, 1f
> -	/* Asynchronous TCF occurred for TTBR0 access, set the TI flag */
> -	orr	\flgs, \flgs, #_TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT
> -	str	\flgs, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS]
> -	msr_s	SYS_TFSRE0_EL1, xzr
> -1:
> -#endif
> -	.endm
> -
> -	/* Clear the MTE asynchronous tag check faults */
> -	.macro clear_mte_async_tcf
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_MTE
> -alternative_if ARM64_MTE
> -	dsb	ish
> -	msr_s	SYS_TFSRE0_EL1, xzr
> -alternative_else_nop_endif
> -#endif
> -	.endm
> -
>  	.macro mte_set_gcr, tmp, tmp2
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_MTE
>  	/*
> @@ -243,8 +217,6 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
>  	ldr	x19, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS]
>  	disable_step_tsk x19, x20
>  
> -	/* Check for asynchronous tag check faults in user space */
> -	check_mte_async_tcf x19, x22
>  	apply_ssbd 1, x22, x23
>  
>  	ptrauth_keys_install_kernel tsk, x20, x22, x23
> @@ -775,8 +747,6 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(ret_to_user)
>  	cbnz	x2, work_pending
>  finish_ret_to_user:
>  	user_enter_irqoff
> -	/* Ignore asynchronous tag check faults in the uaccess routines */
> -	clear_mte_async_tcf
>  	enable_step_tsk x19, x2
>  #ifdef CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK
>  	bl	stackleak_erase
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
> index b3c70a612c7a..e759b0eca47e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
> @@ -166,14 +166,35 @@ static void set_gcr_el1_excl(u64 excl)
>  	 */
>  }
>  
> +void check_mte_async_tcf0(void)

As above, this'll need to be noinstr. I also reckon we should put this
in the header so that it can be inlined.

> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * dsb(ish) is not required before the register read
> +	 * because the TFSRE0_EL1 is automatically synchronized
> +	 * by the hardware on exception entry as SCTLR_EL1.ITFSB
> +	 * is set.
> +	 */
> +	u64 tcf0 = read_sysreg_s(SYS_TFSRE0_EL1);

Shouldn't we have an MTE feature check first?

> +
> +	if (tcf0 & SYS_TFSR_EL1_TF0)
> +		set_thread_flag(TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT);
> +
> +	write_sysreg_s(0, SYS_TFSRE0_EL1);
> +}
> +
> +void clear_mte_async_tcf0(void)
> +{
> +	dsb(ish);
> +	write_sysreg_s(0, SYS_TFSRE0_EL1);
> +}

Likewise here on all counts.

Thanks,
Mark.

>  void flush_mte_state(void)
>  {
>  	if (!system_supports_mte())
>  		return;
>  
>  	/* clear any pending asynchronous tag fault */
> -	dsb(ish);
> -	write_sysreg_s(0, SYS_TFSRE0_EL1);
> +	clear_mte_async_tcf0();
>  	clear_thread_flag(TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT);
>  	/* disable tag checking */
>  	set_sctlr_el1_tcf0(SCTLR_EL1_TCF0_NONE);
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ