[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <453417.1617969640@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 13:00:40 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, jlayton@...nel.org, hch@....de,
linux-cachefs@...hat.com, v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm: Return bool from pagebit test functions
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 11:59:17AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > Make functions that test page bits return a bool, not an int. This means
> > that the value is definitely 0 or 1 if they're used in arithmetic, rather
> > than rely on test_bit() and friends to return this (though they probably
> > should).
>
> iirc i looked at doing this as part of the folio work, and it ended up
> increasing the size of the kernel. Did you run bloat-o-meter on the
> result of doing this?
Hmmm. With my usual monolithic x86_64 kernel, it makes vmlinux text section
100 bytes larger (19392347 rather than 19392247). I can look into why.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists