linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] hyperv: Detect Nested virtualization support for SVM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cce1a04e-7b72-ea7f-d6eb-099a7e777cf3@linux.microsoft.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Apr 2021 08:23:19 -0400
From:   Vineeth Pillai <viremana@...ux.microsoft.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
        Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] hyperv: Detect Nested virtualization support for SVM


On 4/8/21 11:24 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>
> Technically, you can use normal memory accesses, so long as software guarantees
> the VMCS isn't resident in the VMCS cache and knows the field offsets for the
> underlying CPU.  The lack of an architecturally defined layout is the biggest
> issue, e.g. tacking on dirty bits through a PV ABI would be trivial.
>
>> Yes, you are right. I was referring to the fact that we cant use normal
>> memory accesses, but is a bit mis-worded.
> If you slot in "architectural" it will read nicely, i.e. "VMCB is already an
> architectural datastructure in memory".
Yes, this makes sense. Thanks for the suggestion, will reword as you
suggested.

Thanks,
Vineeth