linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_hotplug: Make unpopulated zones PCP structures unreachable during hot remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YHBL0e8s+EesIyDl@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 9 Apr 2021 14:42:57 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_hotplug: Make unpopulated zones PCP structures
 unreachable during hot remove

On Fri 09-04-21 13:09:57, Mel Gorman wrote:
> zone_pcp_reset allegedly protects against a race with drain_pages
> using local_irq_save but this is bogus. local_irq_save only operates
> on the local CPU. If memory hotplug is running on CPU A and drain_pages
> is running on CPU B, disabling IRQs on CPU A does not affect CPU B and
> offers no protection.

Yes, the synchronization aspect is bogus indeed.

> This patch reorders memory hotremove such that the PCP structures
> relevant to the zone are no longer reachable by the time the structures
> are freed.  With this reordering, no protection is required to prevent
> a use-after-free and the IRQs can be left enabled. zone_pcp_reset is
> renamed to zone_pcp_destroy to make it clear that the per-cpu structures
> are deleted when the function returns.

Wouldn't it be much easier to simply not destroy/reset pcp of an empty
zone at all? The whole point of this exercise seems to be described in
340175b7d14d5. setup_zone_pageset can check for an already allocated pcp
and simply reinitialize it. 
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs