[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210409130329.GD15567@zn.tnic>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 15:03:29 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] KVM: cpuid: fix KVM_GET_EMULATED_CPUID
implementation
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 02:54:19PM +0200, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> This series aims to clarify the behavior of the KVM_GET_EMULATED_CPUID
> ioctl, and fix a corner case where -E2BIG is returned when
> the nent field of struct kvm_cpuid2 is matching the amount of
> emulated entries that kvm returns.
>
> Patch 1 proposes the nent field fix to cpuid.c,
> patch 2 updates the ioctl documentation accordingly and
> patches 3 and 4 extend the x86_64/get_cpuid_test.c selftest to check
> the intended behavior of KVM_GET_EMULATED_CPUID.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@...hat.com>
> ---
> v5:
> - Better comment in cpuid.c (patch 1)
How about you wait a couple of days so people have a chance to look at
your patches instead of sending a new revision every day?
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists