[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YHBkjihVv4+7D62Q@bfoster>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 10:28:30 -0400
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: "Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Allison Collins <allison.henderson@...cle.com>,
Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@...il.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix return of uninitialized value in variable error
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 03:18:34PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> A previous commit removed a call to xfs_attr3_leaf_read that
> assigned an error return code to variable error. We now have
> a few early error return paths to label 'out' that return
> error if error is set; however error now is uninitialized
> so potentially garbage is being returned. Fix this by setting
> error to zero to restore the original behaviour where error
> was zero at the label 'restart'.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
> Fixes: 07120f1abdff ("xfs: Add xfs_has_attr and subroutines")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> index 472b3039eabb..902e5f7e6642 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> @@ -928,6 +928,7 @@ xfs_attr_node_addname(
> * Search to see if name already exists, and get back a pointer
> * to where it should go.
> */
> + error = 0;
> retval = xfs_attr_node_hasname(args, &state);
> if (retval != -ENOATTR && retval != -EEXIST)
> goto out;
I think it would be nicer to initialize at the top of the function as
opposed to try and "preserve" historical behavior, but that nit aside:
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
> --
> 2.30.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists