| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20210409155711.kxf3fjc7csvqpl33@box.shutemov.name>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 18:57:11 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>,
Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v24 22/30] x86/cet/shstk: Add user-mode shadow stack
support
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 03:10:56PM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> Introduce basic shadow stack enabling/disabling/allocation routines.
> A task's shadow stack is allocated from memory with VM_SHADOW_STACK flag
> and has a fixed size of min(RLIMIT_STACK, 4GB).
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
> v24:
> - Rename cet.c to shstk.c, update related areas accordingly.
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/cet.h | 29 +++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 5 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 2 +
> arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 164 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/cet.h
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cet.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cet.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..aa85d599b184
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cet.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef _ASM_X86_CET_H
> +#define _ASM_X86_CET_H
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +struct task_struct;
> +/*
> + * Per-thread CET status
> + */
> +struct cet_status {
> + unsigned long shstk_base;
> + unsigned long shstk_size;
> +};
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_SHADOW_STACK
> +int shstk_setup(void);
> +void shstk_free(struct task_struct *p);
> +void shstk_disable(void);
> +#else
> +static inline int shstk_setup(void) { return 0; }
> +static inline void shstk_free(struct task_struct *p) {}
> +static inline void shstk_disable(void) {}
> +#endif
> +
> +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> +
> +#endif /* _ASM_X86_CET_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> index f1b9ed5efaa9..a5d703fda74e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct vm86;
> #include <asm/unwind_hints.h>
> #include <asm/vmxfeatures.h>
> #include <asm/vdso/processor.h>
> +#include <asm/cet.h>
>
> #include <linux/personality.h>
> #include <linux/cache.h>
> @@ -535,6 +536,10 @@ struct thread_struct {
>
> unsigned int sig_on_uaccess_err:1;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_CET
> + struct cet_status cet;
> +#endif
> +
> /* Floating point and extended processor state */
> struct fpu fpu;
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> index 2ddf08351f0b..0f99b093f350 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -150,6 +150,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER) += unwind_frame.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_UNWINDER_GUESS) += unwind_guess.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT) += sev-es.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_X86_SHADOW_STACK) += shstk.o
> +
> ###
> # 64 bit specific files
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_X86_64),y)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c b/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5406fdf6df3c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * shstk.c - Intel shadow stack support
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2021, Intel Corporation.
> + * Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/mman.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
> +#include <linux/compat.h>
> +#include <linux/sizes.h>
> +#include <linux/user.h>
> +#include <asm/msr.h>
> +#include <asm/fpu/internal.h>
> +#include <asm/fpu/xstate.h>
> +#include <asm/fpu/types.h>
> +#include <asm/cet.h>
> +
> +static void start_update_msrs(void)
> +{
> + fpregs_lock();
> + if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD))
> + __fpregs_load_activate();
> +}
> +
> +static void end_update_msrs(void)
> +{
> + fpregs_unlock();
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long alloc_shstk(unsigned long size, int flags)
> +{
> + struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> + unsigned long addr, populate;
> +
> + /* VM_SHADOW_STACK requires MAP_ANONYMOUS, MAP_PRIVATE */
> + flags |= MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE;
Looks like all callers has flags == 0. Do I miss something.
> +
> + mmap_write_lock(mm);
> + addr = do_mmap(NULL, 0, size, PROT_READ, flags, VM_SHADOW_STACK, 0,
> + &populate, NULL);
> + mmap_write_unlock(mm);
> +
> + if (populate)
> + mm_populate(addr, populate);
If all callers pass down flags==0, populate will never happen.
> +
> + return addr;
> +}
> +
> +int shstk_setup(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long addr, size;
> + struct cet_status *cet = ¤t->thread.cet;
> +
> + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + size = round_up(min_t(unsigned long long, rlimit(RLIMIT_STACK), SZ_4G), PAGE_SIZE);
> + addr = alloc_shstk(size, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
> + return PTR_ERR((void *)addr);
> +
> + cet->shstk_base = addr;
> + cet->shstk_size = size;
> +
> + start_update_msrs();
> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, addr + size);
> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_U_CET, CET_SHSTK_EN);
> + end_update_msrs();
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void shstk_free(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> + struct cet_status *cet = &tsk->thread.cet;
> +
> + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) ||
> + !cet->shstk_size ||
> + !cet->shstk_base)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!tsk->mm)
> + return;
> +
> + while (1) {
> + int r;
> +
> + r = vm_munmap(cet->shstk_base, cet->shstk_size);
> +
> + /*
> + * vm_munmap() returns -EINTR when mmap_lock is held by
> + * something else, and that lock should not be held for a
> + * long time. Retry it for the case.
> + */
Hm, no. -EINTR is not about the lock being held by somebody else. The task
got a signal and need to return to userspace.
I have not looked at the rest of the patches yet, but why do you need a
special free path for shadow stack? Why the normal unmap route doesn't
work for you?
> + if (r == -EINTR) {
> + cond_resched();
> + continue;
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + cet->shstk_base = 0;
> + cet->shstk_size = 0;
> +}
> +
> +void shstk_disable(void)
> +{
> + struct cet_status *cet = ¤t->thread.cet;
> + u64 msr_val;
> +
> + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) ||
> + !cet->shstk_size ||
> + !cet->shstk_base)
> + return;
> +
> + start_update_msrs();
> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_U_CET, msr_val);
> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_U_CET, msr_val & ~CET_SHSTK_EN);
> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, 0);
> + end_update_msrs();
> +
> + shstk_free(current);
> +}
> --
> 2.21.0
>
>
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists