| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <161798487099.29796.13541527645202079257.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 16:14:30 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Valentin Schneider" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Lingutla Chandrasekhar <clingutla@...eaurora.org>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Introduce a CPU capacity comparison helper
The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 4aed8aa41524a1fc6439171881c2bb7ace197528
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/4aed8aa41524a1fc6439171881c2bb7ace197528
Author: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 23:06:28 +01:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 18:02:21 +02:00
sched/fair: Introduce a CPU capacity comparison helper
During load-balance, groups classified as group_misfit_task are filtered
out if they do not pass
group_smaller_max_cpu_capacity(<candidate group>, <local group>);
which itself employs fits_capacity() to compare the sgc->max_capacity of
both groups.
Due to the underlying margin, fits_capacity(X, 1024) will return false for
any X > 819. Tough luck, the capacity_orig's on e.g. the Pixel 4 are
{261, 871, 1024}. If a CPU-bound task ends up on one of those "medium"
CPUs, misfit migration will never intentionally upmigrate it to a CPU of
higher capacity due to the aforementioned margin.
One may argue the 20% margin of fits_capacity() is excessive in the advent
of counter-enhanced load tracking (APERF/MPERF, AMUs), but one point here
is that fits_capacity() is meant to compare a utilization value to a
capacity value, whereas here it is being used to compare two capacity
values. As CPU capacity and task utilization have different dynamics, a
sensible approach here would be to add a new helper dedicated to comparing
CPU capacities.
Also note that comparing capacity extrema of local and source sched_group's
doesn't make much sense when at the day of the day the imbalance will be
pulled by a known env->dst_cpu, whose capacity can be anywhere within the
local group's capacity extrema.
While at it, replace group_smaller_{min, max}_cpu_capacity() with
comparisons of the source group's min/max capacity and the destination
CPU's capacity.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Lingutla Chandrasekhar <clingutla@...eaurora.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210407220628.3798191-4-valentin.schneider@arm.com
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 33 ++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 356637a..9b8ae02 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -113,6 +113,13 @@ int __weak arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu)
*/
#define fits_capacity(cap, max) ((cap) * 1280 < (max) * 1024)
+/*
+ * The margin used when comparing CPU capacities.
+ * is 'cap1' noticeably greater than 'cap2'
+ *
+ * (default: ~5%)
+ */
+#define capacity_greater(cap1, cap2) ((cap1) * 1024 > (cap2) * 1078)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
@@ -8395,26 +8402,6 @@ group_is_overloaded(unsigned int imbalance_pct, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
return false;
}
-/*
- * group_smaller_min_cpu_capacity: Returns true if sched_group sg has smaller
- * per-CPU capacity than sched_group ref.
- */
-static inline bool
-group_smaller_min_cpu_capacity(struct sched_group *sg, struct sched_group *ref)
-{
- return fits_capacity(sg->sgc->min_capacity, ref->sgc->min_capacity);
-}
-
-/*
- * group_smaller_max_cpu_capacity: Returns true if sched_group sg has smaller
- * per-CPU capacity_orig than sched_group ref.
- */
-static inline bool
-group_smaller_max_cpu_capacity(struct sched_group *sg, struct sched_group *ref)
-{
- return fits_capacity(sg->sgc->max_capacity, ref->sgc->max_capacity);
-}
-
static inline enum
group_type group_classify(unsigned int imbalance_pct,
struct sched_group *group,
@@ -8570,7 +8557,7 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
* internally or be covered by avg_load imbalance (eventually).
*/
if (sgs->group_type == group_misfit_task &&
- (!group_smaller_max_cpu_capacity(sg, sds->local) ||
+ (!capacity_greater(capacity_of(env->dst_cpu), sg->sgc->max_capacity) ||
sds->local_stat.group_type != group_has_spare))
return false;
@@ -8654,7 +8641,7 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
*/
if ((env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY) &&
(sgs->group_type <= group_fully_busy) &&
- (group_smaller_min_cpu_capacity(sds->local, sg)))
+ (capacity_greater(sg->sgc->min_capacity, capacity_of(env->dst_cpu))))
return false;
return true;
@@ -9454,7 +9441,7 @@ static struct rq *find_busiest_queue(struct lb_env *env,
* average load.
*/
if (env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY &&
- capacity_of(env->dst_cpu) < capacity &&
+ !capacity_greater(capacity_of(env->dst_cpu), capacity) &&
nr_running == 1)
continue;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists