Message-Id: <acaa2cc2-9b12-442e-a767-3c4b41affa21@www.fastmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 09 Apr 2021 13:44:25 +0930
From:   "Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@...id.au>
To:     "Steven Lee" <steven_lee@...eedtech.com>,
        "Ulf Hansson" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Joel Stanley" <joel@....id.au>,
        "Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        "Ryan Chen" <ryanchen.aspeed@...il.com>,
        "moderated list:ASPEED SD/MMC DRIVER" <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "moderated list:ASPEED SD/MMC DRIVER" <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     "Chin-Ting Kuo" <chin-ting_kuo@...eedtech.com>,
        "Ryan Chen" <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed: Support toggling SD bus signal voltage by GPIO

Hi Steven,

On Thu, 8 Apr 2021, at 11:22, Steven Lee wrote:
> AST2600-A2 EVB provides reference design to support toggling signal
> voltage between 3.3v and 1.8v by power-switch-gpio pin that defined in
> the device tree.

Is this something you think we need support for beyond the EVB? It 
sounds a lot like a knob to enable testing of different SD/MMC power 
configurations and not something that you'd otherwise see in a system 
design.

> It also supporting enabling/disabling SD bus power by
> power-gpio.

This sounds like it could be useful but I'll defer to Ulf with regards 
to the binding.

> 
> In the reference design, GPIOV0 of AST2600-A2 EVB is connected to power
> load switch that providing 3.3v to SD1 bus vdd. GPIOV1 is connected to
> a 1.8v and a 3.3v power load switch that providing signal voltage to
> SD1 bus.
> If GPIOV0 is active high, SD1 bus is enabled. Otherwise, SD1 bus is
> disabled.
> If GPIOV1 is active high, 3.3v power load switch is enabled, SD1 signal
> voltage is 3.3v, otherwise, 1.8v power load switch will be enabled, SD1
> signal voltage becomes 1.8v.
> 
> AST2600-A2 EVB also support toggling signal voltage for SD2 bus.
> The design is the same as SD1 bus. It uses GPIOV2 as power-gpio and
> GPIOV3 as power-switch-gpio.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Lee <steven_lee@...eedtech.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 137 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c 
> b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> index 7d8692e90996..a74a03d37915 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/math64.h>
>  #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
> @@ -30,6 +31,7 @@
>  #define   ASPEED_SDC_S0_PHASE_IN_EN	BIT(2)
>  #define   ASPEED_SDC_S0_PHASE_OUT_EN	GENMASK(1, 0)
>  #define   ASPEED_SDC_PHASE_MAX		31
> +#define ASPEED_CLOCK_PHASE 0xf4

This isn't related to the power GPIOs, and we already have phase 
support as suggested by the macros immediately above the one you've 
added here.

Please remove it and make use of the existing mmc phase devicetree 
binding and driver support.

>  
>  struct aspeed_sdc {
>  	struct clk *clk;
> @@ -58,18 +60,21 @@ struct aspeed_sdhci_phase_desc {
>  	struct aspeed_sdhci_tap_desc out;
>  };
>  
> -struct aspeed_sdhci_pdata {
> +struct aspeed_sdhci_data {

Why are we renaming this? It looks like it creates a lot of noise in 
the patch. The data it captured was platform data, hence 'pdata' in the 
name. In my opinon it's fine if we also have a member called pdata.

>  	unsigned int clk_div_start;
>  	const struct aspeed_sdhci_phase_desc *phase_desc;
>  	size_t nr_phase_descs;
> +	const struct sdhci_pltfm_data *pdata;
>  };
>  
>  struct aspeed_sdhci {
> -	const struct aspeed_sdhci_pdata *pdata;
> +	const struct aspeed_sdhci_data *data;
>  	struct aspeed_sdc *parent;
>  	u32 width_mask;
>  	struct mmc_clk_phase_map phase_map;
>  	const struct aspeed_sdhci_phase_desc *phase_desc;
> +	struct gpio_desc *pwr_pin;
> +	struct gpio_desc *pwr_sw_pin;
>  };
>  
>  static void aspeed_sdc_configure_8bit_mode(struct aspeed_sdc *sdc,
> @@ -209,7 +214,6 @@ static void aspeed_sdhci_set_clock(struct 
> sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>  	sdhci = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>  
>  	parent = clk_get_rate(pltfm_host->clk);
> -

Unrelated whitespace cleanup.

>  	sdhci_writew(host, 0, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
>  
>  	if (clock == 0)
> @@ -234,14 +238,13 @@ static void aspeed_sdhci_set_clock(struct 
> sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>  	 * supporting the value 0 in (EMMC12C[7:6], EMMC12C[15:8]), and 
> capture
>  	 * the 0-value capability in clk_div_start.
>  	 */
> -	for (div = sdhci->pdata->clk_div_start; div < 256; div *= 2) {
> +	for (div = sdhci->data->clk_div_start; div < 256; div *= 2) {
>  		bus = parent / div;
>  		if (bus <= clock)
>  			break;
>  	}
>  
>  	div >>= 1;
> -

Unrelated whitespace cleanup.

>  	clk = div << SDHCI_DIVIDER_SHIFT;
>  
>  	aspeed_sdhci_configure_phase(host, bus);
> @@ -292,8 +295,78 @@ static u32 aspeed_sdhci_readl(struct sdhci_host 
> *host, int reg)
>  	return val;
>  }
>  
> +static void sdhci_aspeed_set_power(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned char mode,
> +				   unsigned short vdd)
> +{
> +	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_priv = sdhci_priv(host);
> +	struct aspeed_sdhci *dev = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_priv);
> +	u8 pwr = 0;
> +
> +	if (!dev->pwr_pin)
> +		return sdhci_set_power(host, mode, vdd);
> +
> +	if (mode != MMC_POWER_OFF) {
> +		switch (1 << vdd) {
> +		case MMC_VDD_165_195:
> +		/*
> +		 * Without a regulator, SDHCI does not support 2.0v
> +		 * so we only get here if the driver deliberately
> +		 * added the 2.0v range to ocr_avail. Map it to 1.8v
> +		 * for the purpose of turning on the power.
> +		 */
> +		case MMC_VDD_20_21:
> +				pwr = SDHCI_POWER_180;
> +				break;
> +		case MMC_VDD_29_30:
> +		case MMC_VDD_30_31:
> +				pwr = SDHCI_POWER_300;
> +				break;
> +		case MMC_VDD_32_33:
> +		case MMC_VDD_33_34:
> +				pwr = SDHCI_POWER_330;
> +				break;
> +		default:
> +				WARN(1, "%s: Invalid vdd %#x\n",
> +				     mmc_hostname(host->mmc), vdd);
> +				break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (host->pwr == pwr)
> +		return;
> +
> +	host->pwr = pwr;
> +
> +	if (pwr == 0) {

Shouldn't we be testing against an SDHCI_POWER_* macro?

> +		gpiod_set_value(dev->pwr_pin, 0);
> +		sdhci_writeb(host, 0, SDHCI_POWER_CONTROL);
> +	} else {
> +		gpiod_set_value(dev->pwr_pin, 1);
> +
> +		if (dev->pwr_sw_pin) {
> +			if (pwr & SDHCI_POWER_330)
> +				gpiod_set_value(dev->pwr_sw_pin, 1);
> +			else if (pwr & SDHCI_POWER_180)
> +				gpiod_set_value(dev->pwr_sw_pin, 0);
> +		}
> +		pwr |= SDHCI_POWER_ON;
> +		sdhci_writeb(host, pwr, SDHCI_POWER_CONTROL);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void aspeed_sdhci_voltage_switch(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> +	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_priv = sdhci_priv(host);
> +	struct aspeed_sdhci *dev = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_priv);
> +
> +	if (dev->pwr_sw_pin)
> +		gpiod_set_value(dev->pwr_sw_pin, 0);
> +}
> +
>  static const struct sdhci_ops aspeed_sdhci_ops = {
>  	.read_l = aspeed_sdhci_readl,
> +	.set_power = sdhci_aspeed_set_power,
> +	.voltage_switch = aspeed_sdhci_voltage_switch,
>  	.set_clock = aspeed_sdhci_set_clock,
>  	.get_max_clock = aspeed_sdhci_get_max_clock,
>  	.set_bus_width = aspeed_sdhci_set_bus_width,
> @@ -302,9 +375,14 @@ static const struct sdhci_ops aspeed_sdhci_ops = {
>  	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
>  };
>  
> -static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data aspeed_sdhci_pdata = {
> +static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data ast2400_sdhci_pdata = {
>  	.ops = &aspeed_sdhci_ops,
>  	.quirks = SDHCI_QUIRK_CAP_CLOCK_BASE_BROKEN,
> +	.quirks2 = SDHCI_QUIRK2_CLOCK_DIV_ZERO_BROKEN | 
> SDHCI_QUIRK2_PRESET_VALUE_BROKEN,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data ast2600_sdhci_pdata = {
> +	.ops = &aspeed_sdhci_ops,
>  };
>  
>  static inline int aspeed_sdhci_calculate_slot(struct aspeed_sdhci *dev,
> @@ -327,27 +405,28 @@ static inline int 
> aspeed_sdhci_calculate_slot(struct aspeed_sdhci *dev,
>  
>  static int aspeed_sdhci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> -	const struct aspeed_sdhci_pdata *aspeed_pdata;
> +	const struct aspeed_sdhci_data *aspeed_data;
>  	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host;
>  	struct aspeed_sdhci *dev;
>  	struct sdhci_host *host;
>  	struct resource *res;
> +	u32 reg_val;
>  	int slot;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	aspeed_pdata = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> -	if (!aspeed_pdata) {
> +	aspeed_data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> +	if (!aspeed_data) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing platform configuration data\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	host = sdhci_pltfm_init(pdev, &aspeed_sdhci_pdata, sizeof(*dev));
> +	host = sdhci_pltfm_init(pdev, aspeed_data->pdata, sizeof(*dev));
>  	if (IS_ERR(host))
>  		return PTR_ERR(host);
>  
>  	pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>  	dev = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> -	dev->pdata = aspeed_pdata;
> +	dev->data = aspeed_data;
>  	dev->parent = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
>  
>  	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> @@ -358,8 +437,8 @@ static int aspeed_sdhci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	else if (slot >= 2)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (slot < dev->pdata->nr_phase_descs) {
> -		dev->phase_desc = &dev->pdata->phase_desc[slot];
> +	if (slot < dev->data->nr_phase_descs) {
> +		dev->phase_desc = &dev->data->phase_desc[slot];
>  	} else {
>  		dev_info(&pdev->dev,
>  			 "Phase control not supported for slot %d\n", slot);
> @@ -372,6 +451,23 @@ static int aspeed_sdhci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	sdhci_get_of_property(pdev);
>  
> +	if (of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.parent->of_node, "mmc-hs200-1_8v") ||
> +	    of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.parent->of_node, "sd-uhs-sdr104")) {
> +		reg_val = readl(host->ioaddr + 0x40);

Shouldn't this use  sdhci_readl()?

> +		/* support 1.8V */
> +		reg_val |= BIT(26);
> +		/* write to sdhci140 or sdhci240 mirror register */
> +		writel(reg_val, dev->parent->regs + (0x10 * (slot + 1)));

I think I prefer a helper for this, like 
aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(dev->parent, reg_val, slot, cap_idx), 
rather than poking the global SD controller config space from the SDHCI 
driver.

> +	}
> +
> +	if (of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.parent->of_node, "sd-uhs-sdr104")) {
> +		reg_val = readl(host->ioaddr + 0x44);
> +		/* SDR104 */
> +		reg_val |= BIT(1);
> +		/* write to sdhci144 or sdhci244 mirror register */
> +		writel(reg_val, dev->parent->regs + (0x04 + (slot + 1) * 0x10));

As above.

> +	}
> +
>  	pltfm_host->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>  	if (IS_ERR(pltfm_host->clk))
>  		return PTR_ERR(pltfm_host->clk);
> @@ -389,6 +485,22 @@ static int aspeed_sdhci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (dev->phase_desc)
>  		mmc_of_parse_clk_phase(host->mmc, &dev->phase_map);
>  
> +	dev->pwr_pin = devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "power", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);

Shouldn't this use devm_gpiod_get_optional()?

> +	if (!IS_ERR(dev->pwr_pin)) {
> +		gpiod_set_consumer_name(dev->pwr_pin, "mmc_pwr");
> +		gpiod_direction_output(dev->pwr_pin, 1);
> +	} else {
> +		dev->pwr_pin = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev->pwr_sw_pin = devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "power-switch", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);

Shouldn't this use devm_gpiod_get_optional()?

> +	if (!IS_ERR(dev->pwr_sw_pin)) {
> +		gpiod_set_consumer_name(dev->pwr_sw_pin, "mmc_pwr_sw");
> +		gpiod_direction_output(dev->pwr_sw_pin, 0);
> +	} else {
> +		dev->pwr_sw_pin = NULL;
> +	}
> +
>  	ret = sdhci_add_host(host);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto err_sdhci_add;
> @@ -420,8 +532,9 @@ static int aspeed_sdhci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static const struct aspeed_sdhci_pdata ast2400_sdhci_pdata = {
> +static const struct aspeed_sdhci_data ast2400_sdhci_data = {
>  	.clk_div_start = 2,
> +	.pdata = &ast2400_sdhci_pdata,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct aspeed_sdhci_phase_desc ast2600_sdhci_phase[] = {
> @@ -453,16 +566,17 @@ static const struct aspeed_sdhci_phase_desc 
> ast2600_sdhci_phase[] = {
>  	},
>  };
>  
> -static const struct aspeed_sdhci_pdata ast2600_sdhci_pdata = {
> +static const struct aspeed_sdhci_data ast2600_sdhci_data = {
>  	.clk_div_start = 1,
>  	.phase_desc = ast2600_sdhci_phase,
>  	.nr_phase_descs = ARRAY_SIZE(ast2600_sdhci_phase),
> +	.pdata = &ast2600_sdhci_pdata,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id aspeed_sdhci_of_match[] = {
> -	{ .compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-sdhci", .data = &ast2400_sdhci_pdata, },
> -	{ .compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-sdhci", .data = &ast2400_sdhci_pdata, },
> -	{ .compatible = "aspeed,ast2600-sdhci", .data = &ast2600_sdhci_pdata, },
> +	{ .compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-sdhci", .data = &ast2400_sdhci_data, },
> +	{ .compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-sdhci", .data = &ast2400_sdhci_data, },
> +	{ .compatible = "aspeed,ast2600-sdhci", .data = &ast2600_sdhci_data, },
>  	{ }
>  };
>  
> @@ -482,6 +596,7 @@ static int aspeed_sdc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct device_node *parent, *child;
>  	struct aspeed_sdc *sdc;
>  	int ret;
> +	u32 timing_phase;
>  
>  	sdc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sdc), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!sdc)
> @@ -506,6 +621,10 @@ static int aspeed_sdc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto err_clk;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> +				  "timing-phase", &timing_phase))
> +		writel(timing_phase, sdc->regs + ASPEED_CLOCK_PHASE);

As mentioned at the top, please use the existing phase bindings.

Cheers,

Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists