[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQzf+ZkyKX42=R1OaYobPdK-XBiQ8xxgXbY=THAw=78+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 13:48:10 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86/syscalls: fix -Wmissing-prototypes warnings from COND_SYSCALL()
Hello, x86 maintainers,
Thanks for picking up 1/7.
Could you check 2/7 - 7/7, please?
Thank you.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:31 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 8:48 PM Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Masahiro,
> >
> > What is the status of this patch? Could you please push it to -next?
> > This would avoid emails from lkp:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/202103191423.Jl0jVzfL-lkp@intel.com/
>
>
> Hmm, I also want to know the answer.
> This is the *third* time that I resent this patch
> to the x86 ML.
>
> This is a territory of the x86 subsystem
> because it is only touching
> arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h
> It is preferred to get this in via the x86 tree.
>
> x86 Maintainers,
> could you take a look please?
>
>
>
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists