[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YHAPOKPTgJcLuDJl@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 10:24:24 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux-RT-Users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] mm/page_alloc: Convert per-cpu list protection to
local_lock
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 08:59:39AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> In the end I just gave up and kept it simple as there is no benefit to
> !PREEMPT_RT which just disables IRQs. Maybe it'll be worth considering when
> PREEMPT_RT is upstream and can be enabled. The series was functionally
> tested on the PREEMPT_RT tree by reverting the page_alloc.c patch and
> applies this series and all of its prerequisites on top.
Right, I see the problem. Fair enough; perhaps ammend the changelog to
include some of that so that we can 'remember' in a few months why the
code is 'funneh'.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists