[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210409083132.GB31366@linux>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 10:31:32 +0200
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To: Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shy828301@...il.com,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, ying.huang@...el.com,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, david@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] mm/vmscan: add helper for querying ability to age
anonymous pages
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 11:40:13AM -0700, Wei Xu wrote:
> anon_should_be_aged() doesn't really need "lruvec". It essentially
> answers whether the pages of the given node can be swapped or demoted.
> So it would be clearer and less confusing if anon_should_be_aged()
> takes "pgdat" instead of "lruvec" as the argument. The call to
> mem_cgroup_lruvec(NULL, pgdat) in age_active_anon() can then be removed
> as well.
I tend to agree with this, and I would go one step further with the naming.
For me, taking into account the nature of the function that tells us whether
we have any means to age those pages, a better fit would be something like
anon_can_be_aged(). IIUC, the "should age" part would be inactive_is_low().
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists