linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: Fix use-after-free with devm_spi_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPnigKnV+=X9jn+iD2-DemfujRobANcL1NztXQjp_PeGbkWejw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Apr 2021 02:05:05 -0700
From:   William Kennington <wak@...gle.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Fix use-after-free with devm_spi_alloc_*

For the header file comment? I think it's actually backwards since
`devm_allocated = true` would indicate the device is managed with
devres. Should I send a followup change or v2?


On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 12:20 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, April 7, 2021, William A. Kennington III <wak@...gle.com> wrote:
>>
>> We can't rely on the contents of the devres list during
>> spi_unregister_controller(), as the list is already torn down at the
>> time we perform devres_find() for devm_spi_release_controller. This
>> causes devices registered with devm_spi_alloc_{master,slave}() to be
>> mistakenly identified as legacy, non-devm managed devices and have their
>> reference counters decremented below 0.
>>
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 660 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x108/0x174
>> [<b0396f04>] (refcount_warn_saturate) from [<b03c56a4>] (kobject_put+0x90/0x98)
>> [<b03c5614>] (kobject_put) from [<b0447b4c>] (put_device+0x20/0x24)
>>  r4:b6700140
>> [<b0447b2c>] (put_device) from [<b07515e8>] (devm_spi_release_controller+0x3c/0x40)
>> [<b07515ac>] (devm_spi_release_controller) from [<b045343c>] (release_nodes+0x84/0xc4)
>>  r5:b6700180 r4:b6700100
>> [<b04533b8>] (release_nodes) from [<b0454160>] (devres_release_all+0x5c/0x60)
>>  r8:b1638c54 r7:b117ad94 r6:b1638c10 r5:b117ad94 r4:b163dc10
>> [<b0454104>] (devres_release_all) from [<b044e41c>] (__device_release_driver+0x144/0x1ec)
>>  r5:b117ad94 r4:b163dc10
>> [<b044e2d8>] (__device_release_driver) from [<b044f70c>] (device_driver_detach+0x84/0xa0)
>>  r9:00000000 r8:00000000 r7:b117ad94 r6:b163dc54 r5:b1638c10 r4:b163dc10
>> [<b044f688>] (device_driver_detach) from [<b044d274>] (unbind_store+0xe4/0xf8)
>>
>> Instead, determine the devm allocation state as a flag on the
>> controller which is guaranteed to be stable during cleanup.
>>
>> Fixes: 5e844cc37a5c ("spi: Introduce device-managed SPI controller allocation")
>> Signed-off-by: William A. Kennington III <wak@...gle.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/spi/spi.c       | 9 ++-------
>>  include/linux/spi/spi.h | 3 +++
>>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
>> index b08efe88ccd6..904a353798b6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
>> @@ -2496,6 +2496,7 @@ struct spi_controller *__devm_spi_alloc_controller(struct device *dev,
>>
>>         ctlr = __spi_alloc_controller(dev, size, slave);
>>         if (ctlr) {
>> +               ctlr->devm_allocated = true;
>>                 *ptr = ctlr;
>>                 devres_add(dev, ptr);
>>         } else {
>> @@ -2842,11 +2843,6 @@ int devm_spi_register_controller(struct device *dev,
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_spi_register_controller);
>>
>> -static int devm_spi_match_controller(struct device *dev, void *res, void *ctlr)
>> -{
>> -       return *(struct spi_controller **)res == ctlr;
>> -}
>> -
>>  static int __unregister(struct device *dev, void *null)
>>  {
>>         spi_unregister_device(to_spi_device(dev));
>> @@ -2893,8 +2889,7 @@ void spi_unregister_controller(struct spi_controller *ctlr)
>>         /* Release the last reference on the controller if its driver
>>          * has not yet been converted to devm_spi_alloc_master/slave().
>>          */
>> -       if (!devres_find(ctlr->dev.parent, devm_spi_release_controller,
>> -                        devm_spi_match_controller, ctlr))
>> +       if (!ctlr->devm_allocated)
>>                 put_device(&ctlr->dev);
>>
>>         /* free bus id */
>> diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi.h b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
>> index 592897fa4f03..643139b1eafe 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
>> @@ -510,6 +510,9 @@ struct spi_controller {
>>
>>  #define SPI_MASTER_GPIO_SS             BIT(5)  /* GPIO CS must select slave */
>>
>> +       /* flag indicating this is a non-devres managed controller */
>
>
>
> Isn’t “non-“ part confusing a lot?
>
>>
>> +       bool                    devm_allocated;
>> +
>>         /* flag indicating this is an SPI slave controller */
>>         bool                    slave;
>>
>> --
>> 2.31.0.208.g409f899ff0-goog
>>
>
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>