[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210409111033.2465074-1-lucjan.lucjanov@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 13:10:33 +0200
From: Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@...il.com>
To: lucjan.lucjanov@...il.com
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
masahiroy@...nel.org, oleksandr@...alenko.name,
sedat.dilek@...il.com
Subject: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kbuild: add support for zstd compressed modules
I originally posted the patch in a different form [1] even before Masahiro's changes.
I've been testing this solution since December last year and posted it in March this year,
after I made sure everything was working fine. This patch was tested by Oleksandr and he also didn't report any objections. [2]
Masahiro notified me about the planned changes [3] and asked me to resend this patch, adjusted to those changes, which I did.
My current logs:
lucjan@...hlinux ~ $ zgrep CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO /proc/config.gz
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y
# CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_REDUCED is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_COMPRESSED is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_SPLIT is not set
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF4=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES=y
lucjan@...hlinux ~ $ zgrep CONFIG_MODULE_COMPRESS_ZSTD /proc/config.gz
CONFIG_MODULE_COMPRESS_ZSTD=y
CONFIG_MODULE_COMPRESS_ZSTD_LEVEL=19
Pay no attention to CONFIG_MODULE_COMPRESS_ZSTD_LEVEL as this is not in the upstream, it's an additional patch I use.
The only difference - I don't use clang. Maybe those who use will comment on this.
I relied on the opinions of Oleksander and a dozen other users who reported no errors in using zstd module compression.
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kbuild&m=161710402402989&w=2
[2] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kbuild&m=161710503403517&w=2
[3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kbuild&m=161780602730829&w=2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists