[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYm0yG7mC0H7YwgQdPP1eT=GSkvHbohA7jc6LDsVPsZBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 02:07:26 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: use 'int' for register masks in Exynos
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 9:50 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com> wrote:
> The Special Function Registers on all Exynos SoC, including ARM64, are
> 32-bit wide, so entire driver uses matching functions like readl() or
> writel(). On 64-bit ARM using unsigned long for register masks:
> 1. makes little sense as immediately after bitwise operation it will be
> cast to 32-bit value when calling writel(),
> 2. is actually error-prone because it might promote other operands to
> 64-bit.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: Unintentional integer overflow
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
(...)
> Please apply it directly, I don't have any patches for Samsung pinctrl
> in my tree.
OK! Patch applied!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists