[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YHF+f48MM6xEEv9R@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 12:31:27 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
Cc: outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 4/4] staging: rtl8723bs: Change the
type and use of a variable
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 11:56:48AM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> On Saturday, April 10, 2021 11:31:16 AM CEST Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 11:22:32AM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > > Change the type of fw_current_in_ps_mode from u8 to bool, because
> > > it is used everywhere as a bool and, accordingly, it should be
> > > declared as a bool. Shorten the controlling
> > > expression of an 'if' statement.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_intf.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_pwrctrl.h | 2 +-
> > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_intf.c
> > > b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_intf.c index
> > > 96fe172ced8d..8dc4dd8c6d4c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_intf.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_intf.c
> > > @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ void rtw_hal_dm_watchdog(struct adapter *padapter)
> > >
> > > void rtw_hal_dm_watchdog_in_lps(struct adapter *padapter)
> > > {
> > >
> > > - if (adapter_to_pwrctl(padapter)->fw_current_in_ps_mode == true)
> {
> > > + if (adapter_to_pwrctl(padapter)->fw_current_in_ps_mode) {
> > >
> > > if (padapter->HalFunc.hal_dm_watchdog_in_lps)
> > >
> > > padapter-
> >HalFunc.hal_dm_watchdog_in_lps(padapter); /* this
> > > function caller is in interrupt context
> */>
> > > }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_pwrctrl.h
> > > b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_pwrctrl.h index
> > > 0a48f1653be5..0767dbb84199 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_pwrctrl.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_pwrctrl.h
> > > @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ struct pwrctrl_priv {
> > >
> > > u8 LpsIdleCount;
> > > u8 power_mgnt;
> > > u8 org_power_mgnt;
> > >
> > > - u8 fw_current_in_ps_mode;
> > > + bool fw_current_in_ps_mode;
> > >
> > > unsigned long DelayLPSLastTimeStamp;
> > > s32 pnp_current_pwr_state;
> > > u8 pnp_bstop_trx;
> >
> > If this is only checked, how can it ever be true? Who ever sets this
> > value?
> >
> You're right. It is not set, therefore the "if" control expression cannot
> ever be "true".
>
> Can I delete this statement in a new patch? Or you prefer I send the whole
> series again with this change in patch 4/4?
Just delete the variable from the structure entirely and when it is
used.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists