linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/14] 4.14.230-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6272fcd6-21d1-680e-16e7-5f973e9f8a9f@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Sat, 10 Apr 2021 08:01:01 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/14] 4.14.230-rc1 review

Hi Greg,

On 4/10/21 6:15 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 01:13:06PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 11:53:25AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.230 release.
>>> There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:52:52 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> Build results:
>> 	total: 168 pass: 168 fail: 0
>> Qemu test results:
>> 	total: 408 pass: 408 fail: 0
>>
>> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>>
>> Having said this, I did see a spurious crash, and I see an unusual warning.
>> I have seen the crash only once, but the warning happens with every boot.
>> These are likely not new but exposed because I added network interface
>> tests. This is all v4.14.y specific; I did not see it in other branches.
>> See below for the tracebacks. Maybe someone has seen it before.
> 
> Thanks for testing all of these, I'll go queue up your reported fixes
> here for the next release.
> 

You'll need one more patch to avoid yet another warning:

b0949618826c net/ncsi: Avoid GFP_KERNEL in response handler

Thanks,
Guenter