linux-kernel - Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v3 4/4] staging: rtl8723bs: core: Change a controlling expression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4476737.Uq5WOKsIPT@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Sun, 11 Apr 2021 12:30:19 +0200
From:   "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v3 4/4] staging: rtl8723bs: core: Change a controlling expression

On Sunday, April 11, 2021 12:10:17 PM CEST Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2021, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > On Sunday, April 11, 2021 11:51:32 AM CEST Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > On Sun, 11 Apr 2021, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, April 11, 2021 11:26:41 AM CEST Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 11 Apr 2021, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > > > > > Change a controlling expression within an 'if' statement: don't
> > > > > > compare
> > > > > > with 'true'.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Changes from v2: Rewrite subject in patch 0/4; remove a patch
> > > > > > from
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > series because it had already been applied (rtl8723bs: core:
> > > > > > Remove
> > > > > > an
> > > > > > unused variable). Changes from v1: Fix a typo in subject of
> > > > > > patch
> > > > > > 1/5,
> > > > > > add patch 5/5.>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c | 2 +-
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c
> > > > > > b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c index
> > > > > > 32079e0f71d5..600366cb1aeb 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c
> > > > > > @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ static void
> > > > > > rtw_lps_change_dtim_hdl(struct
> > > > > > adapter *padapter, u8 dtim)>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  	if (pwrpriv->dtim != dtim)
> > > > > >  	
> > > > > >  		pwrpriv->dtim = dtim;
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > -	if ((pwrpriv->fw_current_in_ps_mode == true) && (pwrpriv-
> > > > >
> > > > >pwr_mode >
> > > > >
> > > > > > PS_MODE_ACTIVE)) { +	if ((pwrpriv->fw_current_in_ps_mode) 
&&
> > > > > > (pwrpriv->pwr_mode > PS_MODE_ACTIVE)) {
> > > > > 
> > > > > The parentheses in the left argument of && can be dropped as
> > > > > well.
> > > > 
> > > > What about the parentheses of the right argument? I'm not sure:
> > > > does
> > > > '>'
> > > > have precedence over '&&'? Doesn't it?
> > > 
> > > On the right they are not actually needed either:
> > So, I remembered well :)
> > 
> > > https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/operator_precedence
> > 
> > Very nice table. Thanks for the link.
> > 
> > > But you could look around in the code and see what people typically
> > > do.
> > > Perhaps one might find the parentheses more clear when there is a
> > > binary
> > > operator.  But when there is no binary operator, they could be more
> > > confusing than useful.
> > 
> > When I look around in the code I see a lot of unnecessary parentheses.
> > What people typically do is not always the right thing. I prefer to
> > remove parentheses where they are redundant.
> 
> Not sure I was clear.  This driver seems to be very enthusiastic about
> parentheses.  But perhaps check in other more mature parts of the
> kernel.
>
Sorry, I thought you were specifically referring to that file.

I've run "grep" in ./kernel/locking and others mature parts of Linux. 
You're right: experienced authors use parentheses when there are binary 
operators. Therefore, I'll leave that right hand argument as is within 
parentheses.

Thanks again,

Fabio
> 
> julia
> 
> > Thanks for your kind help,
> > 
> > Fabio
> > 
> > > julia
> > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > Fabio
> > > > 
> > > > > julia
> > > > > 
> > > > > >  		u8 ps_mode = pwrpriv->pwr_mode;
> > > > > >  		
> > > > > >  		rtw_hal_set_hwreg(padapter, 
HW_VAR_H2C_FW_PWRMODE,
> > > > 
> > > > (u8
> > > > 
> > > > > >  		*)(&ps_mode));
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.31.1
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > > > > > Google
> > > > > > Groups "outreachy-kernel" group. To unsubscribe from this group
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
> > > > > > outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com. To view this
> > > > > > discussion
> > > > > > on the web visit
> > > > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/202104110829
> > > > > > 08.3
> > > > > > 187
> > > > > > 6-5-fmdefrancesco%40gmail.com.