[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f237fbd4-2ebf-0105-2a1a-93672cd446cb@acm.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 08:58:52 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
njavali@...vell.com, GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com,
jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: qla2xxx: Re-use existing error handling path
On 4/11/21 2:21 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> The code above this hunk looks spurious to me.
>
> It looks like an error handling path (i.e.
> "if (response_len > bsg_job->reply_payload.payload_len)")
> but returns 0, which is the initial value of 'ret'.
>
> Shouldn't we have ret = -<something> here?
Hmm ... if I read that code path correctly it is on purpose that that
code path returns 0 and error reporting happens by reporting the
EXT_STATUS_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL error code to user space.
> ---
> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_bsg.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_bsg.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_bsg.c
> index aef2f7cc89d3..d42b2ad84049 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_bsg.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_bsg.c
> @@ -2585,8 +2585,8 @@ qla2x00_get_host_stats(struct bsg_job *bsg_job)
>
> data = kzalloc(response_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!data) {
> - kfree(req_data);
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto host_stat_out;
> }
>
> ret = qla2xxx_get_ini_stats(fc_bsg_to_shost(bsg_job), req_data->stat_type,
Since the above looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists