[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <C7F7BE8D-562B-4BC3-A209-8EDD7DAF0AAA@amacapital.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:57:20 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/msr: Block writes to certain MSRs unconditionally
> On Apr 11, 2021, at 9:43 AM, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I have actually seen real user programs poke MSR_SYSCALL_MASK.
>
> Hmm, what was the use case?
>
>
Working around a kernel bug. The workaround only worked on AMD systems. The correct solution was to fix the kernel bug, not poke MSRs.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists