[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210411210642.11362-1-rdunlap@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 14:06:42 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm: eliminate "expecting prototype" kernel-doc warnings
Fix stray kernel-doc warnings in mm/ due to mis-typed or missing
function names.
Quietens these kernel-doc warnings:
../mm/mmu_gather.c:264: warning: expecting prototype for tlb_gather_mmu(). Prototype was for __tlb_gather_mmu() instead
../mm/oom_kill.c:180: warning: expecting prototype for Check whether unreclaimable slab amount is greater than(). Prototype was for should_dump_unreclaim_slab() instead
../mm/shuffle.c:155: warning: expecting prototype for shuffle_free_memory(). Prototype was for __shuffle_free_memory() instead
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
---
v2: Move/add kernel-doc in mmu_gather.c. Demote kernel-doc in oom_kill.c
and shuffle.c to normal comments. (All suggested by Matthew.)
mm/mmu_gather.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
mm/oom_kill.c | 2 +-
mm/shuffle.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- linux-next-20210409.orig/mm/mmu_gather.c
+++ linux-next-20210409/mm/mmu_gather.c
@@ -249,16 +249,6 @@ void tlb_flush_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tl
tlb_flush_mmu_free(tlb);
}
-/**
- * tlb_gather_mmu - initialize an mmu_gather structure for page-table tear-down
- * @tlb: the mmu_gather structure to initialize
- * @mm: the mm_struct of the target address space
- * @fullmm: @mm is without users and we're going to destroy the full address
- * space (exit/execve)
- *
- * Called to initialize an (on-stack) mmu_gather structure for page-table
- * tear-down from @mm.
- */
static void __tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm,
bool fullmm)
{
@@ -283,11 +273,30 @@ static void __tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_
inc_tlb_flush_pending(tlb->mm);
}
+/**
+ * tlb_gather_mmu - initialize an mmu_gather structure for page-table tear-down
+ * @tlb: the mmu_gather structure to initialize
+ * @mm: the mm_struct of the target address space
+ *
+ * Called to initialize an (on-stack) mmu_gather structure for page-table
+ * tear-down from @mm.
+ */
void tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm)
{
__tlb_gather_mmu(tlb, mm, false);
}
+/**
+ * tlb_gather_mmu_fullmm - initialize an mmu_gather structure for page-table tear-down
+ * @tlb: the mmu_gather structure to initialize
+ * @mm: the mm_struct of the target address space
+ *
+ * In this case, @mm is without users and we're going to destroy the
+ * full address space (exit/execve).
+ *
+ * Called to initialize an (on-stack) mmu_gather structure for page-table
+ * tear-down from @mm.
+ */
void tlb_gather_mmu_fullmm(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm)
{
__tlb_gather_mmu(tlb, mm, true);
--- linux-next-20210409.orig/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ linux-next-20210409/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static bool oom_unkillable_task(struct t
return false;
}
-/**
+/*
* Check whether unreclaimable slab amount is greater than
* all user memory(LRU pages).
* dump_unreclaimable_slab() could help in the case that
--- linux-next-20210409.orig/mm/shuffle.c
+++ linux-next-20210409/mm/shuffle.c
@@ -147,8 +147,8 @@ void __meminit __shuffle_zone(struct zon
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&z->lock, flags);
}
-/**
- * shuffle_free_memory - reduce the predictability of the page allocator
+/*
+ * __shuffle_free_memory - reduce the predictability of the page allocator
* @pgdat: node page data
*/
void __meminit __shuffle_free_memory(pg_data_t *pgdat)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists