linux-kernel - Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v2 0/5] staging: rtl8723bs: Change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3154849.IkRRYng9eG@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:11:43 +0200
From:   "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v2 0/5] staging: rtl8723bs: Change

On Sunday, April 11, 2021 8:39:18 AM CEST Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 05:00:03PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > Remove camelcase, correct misspelled words in comments, remove an
> > unused
> > variable, change the type of a variable and its use, change comparisons
> > with 'true' in controlling expressions.
> > 
> > Changes from v1: Fix a typo in subject of patch 1/5, add patch 5/5.
> 
> The subject line above is very odd :(
>
True. I've just read the output of git format in /tmp and noticed that the 
line with the "subject" was broken in two different one. I think I had 
pressed return while editing.

I'm about to send that series again with v3.

In the while I noticed you sent a note to let me know that the you have  
added the patch titled "staging: rtl8723bs: core: Remove an unused 
variable" to your staging git tree. 

I think this could be a potential issue because the same patch is in the 
series that I have to send anew. I put that patch in the series because 
yesterday you wrote that the message with subject "Outreachy patches caught 
up on.", asking to rebase and resend.

However, I'm about to send v3 of this patchset. I have no idea whether or 
not you will have problems in applying that. If you have problems with it, 
please let me know.

Thanks,

Fabio