[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210412095714.uivebcatgazzq5ae@uno.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:57:14 +0200
From: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>
To: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 28/30] dt-bindings: media: atmel: add microchip-xisc
binding
Hi Eugene,
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 06:51:03PM +0300, Eugen Hristev wrote:
> Add bindings for the microchip xisc, a driver based on atmel-isc.
> It shares common code with atmel-isc, but the xisc is the next generation
> ISC which is present on sama7g5 product.
> It has an enhanced pipeline, additional modules, formats, and it supports
> not only parallel sensors, but also serial sensors, by connecting to a demux
> endpoint present on sama7g5.
> One of the key points for creating a new binding is the clocking scheme, as
> atmel-isc requires 3 mandatory clocks, the microchip-xisc requires a single
> input clock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
> ---
>
> Hello Rob, all,
>
> I did not convert this yet to yaml because I would like first your feedback
> if the binding is good.
> If it's fine I will convert both this new binding and the old atmel-isc
> to yaml.
>
> Thanks for your feedback,
> Eugen
>
> .../bindings/media/microchip-xisc.txt | 64 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/microchip-xisc.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/microchip-xisc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/microchip-xisc.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..080a357ed84d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/microchip-xisc.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> +Microchip eXtended Image Sensor Controller (XISC)
> +----------------------------------------------
> +
> +Required properties for XISC:
> +- compatible
> + Must be "microchip,sama7g5-xisc".
> +- reg
> + Physical base address and length of the registers set for the device.
> +- interrupts
> + Should contain IRQ line for the XISC.
> +- clocks
> + List of clock specifiers, corresponding to entries in
> + the clock-names property;
> + Please refer to clock-bindings.txt.
> +- clock-names
> + Required elements: "hclock".
> + This is the clock that clocks the sensor controller, and is usually
> + fed from the clock tree. It is used for the internal controller logic.
> +- #clock-cells
> + Should be 0.
> +- clock-output-names
> + Should be "isc-mck".
> +- pinctrl-names, pinctrl-0
> + Please refer to pinctrl-bindings.txt.
> +
> +Optional properties for XISC:
> +- microchip,mipi-mode;
> + As the XISC is usually connected to a demux/bridge, the XISC receives
> + the same type of input, however, it should be aware of the type of
> + signals received. The mipi-mode enables different internal handling
> + of the data and clock lines.
What does 'mipi-mode' do to a component that has an parallel receiver ?
> +
> +XISC supports a single port node with internal parallel bus.
> +It should contain one 'port' child node with child 'endpoint' node.
> +Please refer to the bindings defined in
> +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt.
> +
> +This endpoint has to be connected to a bridge that acts as a demux from either
> +a serial interface or acts as a simple direct bridge to a parallel sensor.
> +
> +Example:
> +xisc: xisc@...08000 {
> + compatible = "microchip,sama7g5-isc";
> + reg = <0xe1408000 0x2000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 56 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + clocks = <&pmc PMC_TYPE_PERIPHERAL 56>;
> + clock-names = "hclock";
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + clock-output-names = "isc-mck";
> + microchip,mipi-mode;
> +
> + port@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> + xisc_in: endpoint {
> + bus-width = <12>;
> + hsync-active = <1>;
> + vsync-active = <1>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&csi2dc_out>;
nit: indentation
Have you consided using bus-type property ? As that's a new binding I
would consider making it mandatory, and to modify the DT parsinga
routine accordingly to remove auto-guessing, which according to my
understanding is almost 'deprecated' ?
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists