linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: pmc_atom: Match all Beckhoff Automation baytrail boards with critclk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:54:13 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     linux-kernel-dev <linux-kernel-dev@...khoff.com>
Cc:     "hdegoede@...hat.com" <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        "andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com" 
        <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "mgross@...ux.intel.com" <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
        "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" 
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: pmc_atom: Match all Beckhoff Automation
 baytrail boards with critclk_systems DMI table

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 1:39 PM linux-kernel-dev
<linux-kernel-dev@...khoff.com> wrote:
> On Mo, 2021-04-12 at 12:43 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:29 PM Steffen Dirkwinkel
> > <linux-kernel-dev@...khoff.com> wrote:

...

> > I'm afraid it's a bit too much. Is there any guarantee all the boards
> > based on x86 will be Baytrail only?
> >
> Sorry, I guess I should make this clearer in the message.
> All boards with "CBxx63" are Baytrail.

Exactly! And this supports my idea that this shouldn't be done like in
this patch.
Are you guaranteeing that *all x86-based* boards produced by your
company will be Baytrail only?
Above tells that the answer is rather "no". So, I think we can't apply
this patch in its current form.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko