[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210412051135.xtpokwrbclaptbot@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:41:35 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
Cc: agross@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, martin.botka@...ainline.org,
jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] cpufreq-qcom-hw: Implement full OSM programming
On 19-01-21, 18:45, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> **
> ** NOTE: To "view the full picture", please look at the following
> ** patch series:
> ** https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=413355
> ** This is a subset of that series.
> **
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Huge patch series has been split for better reviewability,
> as suggested by Bjorn
> - Rebased code on top of 266991721c15 ("cpufreq: qcom-hw: enable boost
> support")
Bjorn, what am I supposed to do with patchset ? Is there anyone who can give
this some reviews from qcom team ?
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists