linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/188] 5.10.30-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YHRFI/azs/C/Hmga@endor.yaviniv>
Date:   Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:03:31 +0200
From:   Andrei Rabusov <a.rabusov@....de>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/188] 5.10.30-rc1 review

Hello all,

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:38:34AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.30 release.
> There are 188 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:39:44 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.30-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

I tested 5.10.30-rc1 on my i686, the kernel was compiled with gcc 10.2
using make localmodconfig. I found no issues to compile and run the
kernel.

Selftest resluts [ok/not ok]: [1434/82]

"Regression" (compared with 5.10.29-rc1):

75d74
< not ok 1 selftests: rtc: rtctest # TIMEOUT 90 seconds
80d78
< not ok 9 selftests: timers: rtcpie # exit=255

These test results were fluctuating for the previous kernels as well,
thus I can't conclude that this "regression" is actually a real
regression.

Tested-by: Andrei Rabusov <a.rabusov@....de>