[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YHRGPpQ03XgBMkiy@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:08:14 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: dillon.minfei@...il.com
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
lkp@...el.com, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
Gerald Baeza <gerald.baeza@...s.st.com>,
Erwan Le Ray <erwan.leray@...s.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] serial: stm32: optimize spin lock usage
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 05:31:38PM +0800, dillon.minfei@...il.com wrote:
> From: dillon min <dillon.minfei@...il.com>
>
> To avoid potential deadlock in spin_lock usage, use spin_lock_irqsave,
> spin_trylock_irqsave(), spin_unlock_irqrestore() in process context.
This doesn't make much sense as console_write can be called in any
context. And where's the deadlock you claim to be fixing here?
> remove unused local_irq_save/restore call.
>
> Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>
> Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>
> Cc: Gerald Baeza <gerald.baeza@...s.st.com>
> Cc: Erwan Le Ray <erwan.leray@...s.st.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: dillon min <dillon.minfei@...il.com>
> ---
> v2: remove unused code from stm32_usart_threaded_interrupt() according from
> Greg's review.
>
> drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c
> index b3675cf25a69..b1ba5e36e36e 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c
> @@ -1354,13 +1354,12 @@ static void stm32_usart_console_write(struct console *co, const char *s,
> u32 old_cr1, new_cr1;
> int locked = 1;
>
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> if (port->sysrq)
> locked = 0;
> else if (oops_in_progress)
> - locked = spin_trylock(&port->lock);
> + locked = spin_trylock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
> else
> - spin_lock(&port->lock);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
>
> /* Save and disable interrupts, enable the transmitter */
> old_cr1 = readl_relaxed(port->membase + ofs->cr1);
> @@ -1374,8 +1373,7 @@ static void stm32_usart_console_write(struct console *co, const char *s,
> writel_relaxed(old_cr1, port->membase + ofs->cr1);
>
> if (locked)
> - spin_unlock(&port->lock);
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
> }
>
> static int stm32_usart_console_setup(struct console *co, char *options)
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists