linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: pwm: add more compatible strings to pwm-rockchip.yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210412150533.GA3898302@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:05:33 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        heiko@...ech.de, thierry.reding@...il.com, lee.jones@...aro.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: pwm: add more compatible strings to
 pwm-rockchip.yaml

On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 15:10:03 +0200, Johan Jonker wrote:
> The compatible strings below are already in use in the Rockchip
> dtsi files, but were somehow never added to a document, so add
> 
> "rockchip,rk3328-pwm"
> 
> "rockchip,rk3036-pwm", "rockchip,rk2928-pwm"
> 
> "rockchip,rk3368-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm"
> "rockchip,rk3399-pwm", "rockchip,rk3288-pwm"
> 
> "rockchip,px30-pwm", "rockchip,rk3328-pwm"
> "rockchip,rk3308-pwm", "rockchip,rk3328-pwm"
> 
> for pwm nodes to pwm-rockchip.yaml.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
> ---
> Changed V2:
>   changed schema for clocks and clock-names
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 


Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.