linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: phy: marvell: fix detection of PHY on Topaz switches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YHRoEfGi3/l3K6iF@lunn.ch>
Date:   Mon, 12 Apr 2021 17:32:33 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Cc:     Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: marvell: fix detection of PHY on Topaz switches

> Anyway, now I'm looking at phy/marvell.c driver again and it supports
> only 88E6341 and 88E6390 families from whole 88E63xxx range.
> 
> So do we need to define for now table for more than
> MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6341 and MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6390 entries?

Probably not. I've no idea if the 6393 has an ID, so to be safe you
should add that. Assuming it has a family of its own.

       Andrew