[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <FC33D997-21FA-4528-BC04-A4DFFCFF8847@public-files.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:17:23 +0200
From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
To: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Marek Behún <marek.behun@....cz>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
zhang kai <zhangkaiheb@....com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Di Zhu <zhudi21@...wei.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>,
Francis Laniel <laniel_francis@...vacyrequired.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 1/3] net: dsa: allow for multiple CPU ports
Am 12. April 2021 17:30:58 MESZ schrieb DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>:
>So we somehow configured default CPU port in dts (by port name). In
>my opinion we can just add a default CPU property in dts to specify
>it (like Frank Wunderlich did earlier), and fall back to round-robin
>if the property is not present, while still allow users to change it
>in userspace.
My series was an up ported version of Patches (linux 4.9) afair from Felix. The dts-version was 1 reason why it was rejected, because DT describes hardware and not software preferences.
regards Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists