linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mmc: core: Let sanitize not retry in case of timeout/failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:46:56 +0200
From:   Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     "Shimoda, Yoshihiro" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mmc: core: Let sanitize not retry in case of
 timeout/failure

On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 09:50 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> > index 8bfd4d95b386..9778093d7006 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> > @@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ static inline int mmc_blk_part_switch(struct
> > mmc_card *card,
> >                  ret = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> >                                   EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG, part_config,
> > -                                card->ext_csd.part_time);
> > +                                card->ext_csd.part_time,
> > MMC_CMD_RETRIES);
> 
> 
> I would rather not change the mmc_switch() function definition, but
> 
> only __mmc_switch(). Just let mmc_switch() pass another in-parameter
> 
> (MMC_CMD_RETRIES) to __mmc_switch(), which means all callers of
> 
> mmc_switch() doesn't need to get changed, but only callers of
> 
> __mmc_switch().
> 
> 
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> 
Hi Uffe,
Good point, I will change it in the next version of this patch.

thanks,
Bean

> Kind regards
> 
> Uffe