[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ced54f8a-bc17-c3a6-80b8-1664647527e7@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:14:52 +0800
From: liulongfang <liulongfang@...wei.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
<liudongdong3@...wei.com>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>,
<yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] USB:ohci:fix ohci interruption problem
On 2021/4/9 23:07, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 03:47:02PM +0800, Longfang Liu wrote:
>> The operating method of the system entering S4 sleep mode:
>> echo reboot > /sys/power/disk
>> echo disk > /sys/power/state
>>
>> When OHCI enters the S4 sleep state, check the log and find that
>> the USB sleep process will call check_root_hub_suspend() and
>> ohci_bus_suspend() instead ohci_suspend() and ohci_bus_suspend(),
>> which will cause the OHCI interrupt to not be closed.
>>
>> At this time, if just one device interrupt is reported. the
>> driver will not process and close this device interrupt. It will cause
>> the entire system to be stuck during sleep, causing the device to
>> fail to respond.
>>
>> When the abnormal interruption reaches 100,000 times, the system will
>> forcibly close the interruption and make the device unusable.
>>
>> Because the root cause of the problem is that ohci_suspend is not
>> called to perform normal interrupt shutdown operations when the system
>> enters S4 sleep mode.
>>
>> Therefore, our solution is to specify freeze interface in this mode to
>> perform normal suspend_common() operations, and call ohci_suspend()
>> after check_root_hub_suspend() is executed through the suspend_common()
>> operation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Longfang Liu <liulongfang@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in V2:
>> - Modify comment and patch version information.
>
> Please, instead of sending the same incorrect patch over and over again,
> spend some time figuring out what is really going wrong. I have already
> explained why this patch is not the right thing to do.
>
> You have to determine why the poweroff callback in hcd-pci.c (which
> points to hcd_pci_suspend) isn't getting called. That's the real
> explanation for your problem.
>
> Alan Stern
>
Ok! I need to analyze the PCI device sleep and wake process to see
why it will not be called.
Thanks,
Longfang.
>> Changes in V1:
>> - Call suspend_common by adding the hcd_pci_freeze function turn off
>> the interrupt instead of adding a shutdown operation in ohci_bus_suspend
>> to turn off the interrupt.
>>
>> drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.c | 7 ++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.c b/drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.c
>> index 1547aa6..c5844a3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.c
>> @@ -509,6 +509,11 @@ static int resume_common(struct device *dev, int event)
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>
>> +static int hcd_pci_freeze(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + return suspend_common(dev, device_may_wakeup(dev));
>> +}
>> +
>> static int hcd_pci_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> return suspend_common(dev, device_may_wakeup(dev));
>> @@ -605,7 +610,7 @@ const struct dev_pm_ops usb_hcd_pci_pm_ops = {
>> .suspend_noirq = hcd_pci_suspend_noirq,
>> .resume_noirq = hcd_pci_resume_noirq,
>> .resume = hcd_pci_resume,
>> - .freeze = check_root_hub_suspended,
>> + .freeze = hcd_pci_freeze,
>> .freeze_noirq = check_root_hub_suspended,
>> .thaw_noirq = NULL,
>> .thaw = NULL,
>> --
>> 2.8.1
>>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists