linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 023/188] ia64: fix user_stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210412084014.420438665@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:38:57 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@...too.org>,
        "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 023/188] ia64: fix user_stack_pointer() for ptrace()

From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@...too.org>

commit 7ad1e366167837daeb93d0bacb57dee820b0b898 upstream.

ia64 has two stacks:

 - memory stack (or stack), pointed at by by r12

 - register backing store (register stack), pointed at by
   ar.bsp/ar.bspstore with complications around dirty
   register frame on CPU.

In [1] Dmitry noticed that PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO returns the register
stack instead memory stack.

The bug comes from the fact that user_stack_pointer() and
current_user_stack_pointer() don't return the same register:

  ulong user_stack_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs) { return regs->ar_bspstore; }
  #define current_user_stack_pointer() (current_pt_regs()->r12)

The change gets both back in sync.

I think ptrace(PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO) is the only affected user by
this bug on ia64.

The change fixes 'rt_sigreturn.gen.test' strace test where it was
observed initially.

Link: https://bugs.gentoo.org/769614 [1]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210331084447.2561532-1-slyfox@gentoo.org
Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@...too.org>
Reported-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@...linux.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/ia64/include/asm/ptrace.h |    8 +-------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -54,8 +54,7 @@
 
 static inline unsigned long user_stack_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	/* FIXME: should this be bspstore + nr_dirty regs? */
-	return regs->ar_bspstore;
+	return regs->r12;
 }
 
 static inline int is_syscall_success(struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -79,11 +78,6 @@ static inline long regs_return_value(str
 	unsigned long __ip = instruction_pointer(regs);			\
 	(__ip & ~3UL) + ((__ip & 3UL) << 2);				\
 })
-/*
- * Why not default?  Because user_stack_pointer() on ia64 gives register
- * stack backing store instead...
- */
-#define current_user_stack_pointer() (current_pt_regs()->r12)
 
   /* given a pointer to a task_struct, return the user's pt_regs */
 # define task_pt_regs(t)		(((struct pt_regs *) ((char *) (t) + IA64_STK_OFFSET)) - 1)