linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 089/188] KVM: x86/mmu: Dont allow TDP MMU to yield when recovering NX pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210412084016.606911470@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:40:03 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 089/188] KVM: x86/mmu: Dont allow TDP MMU to yield when recovering NX pages

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 33a3164161fc86b9cc238f7f2aa2ccb1d5559b1c ]

Prevent the TDP MMU from yielding when zapping a gfn range during NX
page recovery.  If a flush is pending from a previous invocation of the
zapping helper, either in the TDP MMU or the legacy MMU, but the TDP MMU
has not accumulated a flush for the current invocation, then yielding
will release mmu_lock with stale TLB entries.

That being said, this isn't technically a bug fix in the current code, as
the TDP MMU will never yield in this case.  tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched()
will yield if and only if it has made forward progress, as defined by the
current gfn vs. the last yielded (or starting) gfn.  Because zapping a
single shadow page is guaranteed to (a) find that page and (b) step
sideways at the level of the shadow page, the TDP iter will break its loop
before getting a chance to yield.

But that is all very, very subtle, and will break at the slightest sneeze,
e.g. zapping while holding mmu_lock for read would break as the TDP MMU
wouldn't be guaranteed to see the present shadow page, and thus could step
sideways at a lower level.

Cc: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Message-Id: <20210325200119.1359384-4-seanjc@...gle.com>
[Add lockdep assertion. - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c     |  6 ++----
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c |  5 +++--
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 354f9926a183..defdd717e9da 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -5973,7 +5973,6 @@ static void kvm_recover_nx_lpages(struct kvm *kvm)
 	unsigned int ratio;
 	LIST_HEAD(invalid_list);
 	bool flush = false;
-	gfn_t gfn_end;
 	ulong to_zap;
 
 	rcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
@@ -5994,9 +5993,8 @@ static void kvm_recover_nx_lpages(struct kvm *kvm)
 				      struct kvm_mmu_page,
 				      lpage_disallowed_link);
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(!sp->lpage_disallowed);
-		if (sp->tdp_mmu_page)
-			gfn_end = sp->gfn + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level);
-			flush = kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(kvm, sp->gfn, gfn_end);
+		if (sp->tdp_mmu_page) {
+			flush = kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_sp(kvm, sp);
 		} else {
 			kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, sp, &invalid_list);
 			WARN_ON_ONCE(sp->lpage_disallowed);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index f534c0a15f2b..61c00f8631f1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -495,13 +495,14 @@ static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
  * SPTEs have been cleared and a TLB flush is needed before releasing the
  * MMU lock.
  */
-bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
+bool __kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
+				 bool can_yield)
 {
 	struct kvm_mmu_page *root;
 	bool flush = false;
 
 	for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root)
-		flush = zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, start, end, true, flush);
+		flush = zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, start, end, can_yield, flush);
 
 	return flush;
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
index cbbdbadd1526..a7a3f6db263d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
@@ -12,7 +12,23 @@ bool is_tdp_mmu_root(struct kvm *kvm, hpa_t root);
 hpa_t kvm_tdp_mmu_get_vcpu_root_hpa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_tdp_mmu_free_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root);
 
-bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end);
+bool __kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
+				 bool can_yield);
+static inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start,
+					     gfn_t end)
+{
+	return __kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(kvm, start, end, true);
+}
+static inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+{
+	gfn_t end = sp->gfn + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level);
+
+	/*
+	 * Don't allow yielding, as the caller may have pending pages to zap
+	 * on the shadow MMU.
+	 */
+	return __kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(kvm, sp->gfn, end, false);
+}
 void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all(struct kvm *kvm);
 
 int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, u32 error_code,
-- 
2.30.2