linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.11 005/210] file: fix close

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210412084016.183518359@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:38:30 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+283ce5a46486d6acdbaf@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.11 005/210] file: fix close_range() for unshare+cloexec

From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>

commit 9b5b872215fe6d1ca6a1ef411f130bd58e269012 upstream.

syzbot reported a bug when putting the last reference to a tasks file
descriptor table. Debugging this showed we didn't recalculate the
current maximum fd number for CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE | CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC
after we unshared the file descriptors table. So max_fd could exceed the
current fdtable maximum causing us to set excessive bits. As a concrete
example, let's say the user requested everything from fd 4 to ~0UL to be
closed and their current fdtable size is 256 with their highest open fd
being 4. With CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE the caller will end up with a new
fdtable which has room for 64 file descriptors since that is the lowest
fdtable size we accept. But now max_fd will still point to 255 and needs
to be adjusted. Fix this by retrieving the correct maximum fd value in
__range_cloexec().

Reported-by: syzbot+283ce5a46486d6acdbaf@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 582f1fb6b721 ("fs, close_range: add flag CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC")
Fixes: fec8a6a69103 ("close_range: unshare all fds for CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE | CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC")
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/file.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/file.c
@@ -629,17 +629,30 @@ int close_fd(unsigned fd)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(close_fd); /* for ksys_close() */
 
+/**
+ * last_fd - return last valid index into fd table
+ * @cur_fds: files struct
+ *
+ * Context: Either rcu read lock or files_lock must be held.
+ *
+ * Returns: Last valid index into fdtable.
+ */
+static inline unsigned last_fd(struct fdtable *fdt)
+{
+	return fdt->max_fds - 1;
+}
+
 static inline void __range_cloexec(struct files_struct *cur_fds,
 				   unsigned int fd, unsigned int max_fd)
 {
 	struct fdtable *fdt;
 
-	if (fd > max_fd)
-		return;
-
+	/* make sure we're using the correct maximum value */
 	spin_lock(&cur_fds->file_lock);
 	fdt = files_fdtable(cur_fds);
-	bitmap_set(fdt->close_on_exec, fd, max_fd - fd + 1);
+	max_fd = min(last_fd(fdt), max_fd);
+	if (fd <= max_fd)
+		bitmap_set(fdt->close_on_exec, fd, max_fd - fd + 1);
 	spin_unlock(&cur_fds->file_lock);
 }