[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YHQUH+Nqc/zS14Tb@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:34:23 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: rtl8723bs: Use existing arc4 implementation
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 03:35:52PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Use functions provided by <crypto/arc4.h> instead of hand writing them.
>
> The implementations are slightly different, but are equivalent. It has
> been checked with a test program which compares the output of the 2 sets of
> functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c | 101 ++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c
> index 9587d89a6b24..86949a65e96f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> ******************************************************************************/
> #define _RTW_SECURITY_C_
>
> +#include <crypto/arc4.h>
> #include <linux/crc32poly.h>
> #include <drv_types.h>
> #include <rtw_debug.h>
> @@ -31,66 +32,6 @@ const char *security_type_str(u8 value)
>
> /* WEP related ===== */
>
> -struct arc4context {
> - u32 x;
> - u32 y;
> - u8 state[256];
> -};
> -
> -
> -static void arcfour_init(struct arc4context *parc4ctx, u8 *key, u32 key_len)
> -{
> - u32 t, u;
> - u32 keyindex;
> - u32 stateindex;
> - u8 *state;
> - u32 counter;
> -
> - state = parc4ctx->state;
> - parc4ctx->x = 0;
> - parc4ctx->y = 0;
> - for (counter = 0; counter < 256; counter++)
> - state[counter] = (u8)counter;
> - keyindex = 0;
> - stateindex = 0;
> - for (counter = 0; counter < 256; counter++) {
> - t = state[counter];
> - stateindex = (stateindex + key[keyindex] + t) & 0xff;
> - u = state[stateindex];
> - state[stateindex] = (u8)t;
> - state[counter] = (u8)u;
> - if (++keyindex >= key_len)
> - keyindex = 0;
> - }
> -}
> -
> -static u32 arcfour_byte(struct arc4context *parc4ctx)
> -{
> - u32 x;
> - u32 y;
> - u32 sx, sy;
> - u8 *state;
> -
> - state = parc4ctx->state;
> - x = (parc4ctx->x + 1) & 0xff;
> - sx = state[x];
> - y = (sx + parc4ctx->y) & 0xff;
> - sy = state[y];
> - parc4ctx->x = x;
> - parc4ctx->y = y;
> - state[y] = (u8)sx;
> - state[x] = (u8)sy;
> - return state[(sx + sy) & 0xff];
> -}
> -
> -static void arcfour_encrypt(struct arc4context *parc4ctx, u8 *dest, u8 *src, u32 len)
> -{
> - u32 i;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> - dest[i] = src[i] ^ (unsigned char)arcfour_byte(parc4ctx);
> -}
> -
> static signed int bcrc32initialized;
> static u32 crc32_table[256];
>
> @@ -150,7 +91,7 @@ void rtw_wep_encrypt(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pxmitframe)
> { /* exclude ICV */
>
> unsigned char crc[4];
> - struct arc4context mycontext;
> + struct arc4_ctx mycontext;
Are you sure you can declare that much space on the stack? Is that what
other users of this api do? In looking at the in-kernel users, they do
not :(
Can you fix up this series to not take up so much stack memory?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists