[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2MSJarPMfJ8RrSKDMXte3KQec=+GQ-LzV6HB7-Nm1FcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:55:41 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] uapi: remove the unused HAVE_ARCH_STRUCT_FLOCK64 define
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:55 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
The patch looks good, but I'd like to see a description for each one.
How about:
| The check was added when Stephen Rothwell created the file, but
| no architecture ever defined it.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists