[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000000000000ae236f05bfde0678@google.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:33:19 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+61e04e51b7ac86930589@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, axboe@...nel.dk, bp@...en8.de,
hpa@...or.com, jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
masahiroy@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, seanjc@...gle.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com, will@...nel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: [syzbot] possible deadlock in del_gendisk
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: e99d8a84 Add linux-next specific files for 20210409
git tree: linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13b01681d00000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=7cd69574979bfeb7
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=61e04e51b7ac86930589
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=148265d9d00000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=16a981a1d00000
The issue was bisected to:
commit 997acaf6b4b59c6a9c259740312a69ea549cc684
Author: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Date: Mon Jan 11 15:37:07 2021 +0000
lockdep: report broken irq restoration
bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=16a7e77ed00000
final oops: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=15a7e77ed00000
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11a7e77ed00000
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+61e04e51b7ac86930589@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 997acaf6b4b5 ("lockdep: report broken irq restoration")
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.12.0-rc6-next-20210409-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor104/8440 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888016e9dca0 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: del_gendisk+0x250/0x9e0 block/genhd.c:618
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8c7d9430 (bdev_lookup_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: del_gendisk+0x222/0x9e0 block/genhd.c:616
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (bdev_lookup_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write+0x92/0x150 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1406
del_gendisk+0x222/0x9e0 block/genhd.c:616
loop_remove drivers/block/loop.c:2191 [inline]
loop_control_ioctl drivers/block/loop.c:2291 [inline]
loop_control_ioctl+0x40d/0x4f0 drivers/block/loop.c:2251
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:48 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:753 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:739 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:739
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
-> #1 (loop_ctl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:949 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x139/0x1120 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1096
lo_open+0x1a/0x130 drivers/block/loop.c:1890
__blkdev_get+0x135/0xa30 fs/block_dev.c:1305
blkdev_get_by_dev fs/block_dev.c:1457 [inline]
blkdev_get_by_dev+0x26c/0x600 fs/block_dev.c:1425
blkdev_open+0x154/0x2b0 fs/block_dev.c:1554
do_dentry_open+0x4b9/0x11b0 fs/open.c:826
do_open fs/namei.c:3361 [inline]
path_openat+0x1c09/0x27d0 fs/namei.c:3494
do_filp_open+0x190/0x3d0 fs/namei.c:3521
do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x420 fs/open.c:1187
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1203 [inline]
__do_sys_open fs/open.c:1211 [inline]
__se_sys_open fs/open.c:1207 [inline]
__x64_sys_open+0x119/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1207
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
-> #0 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2938 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3676 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2a17/0x5230 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4902
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5512 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x740 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5477
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:949 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x139/0x1120 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1096
del_gendisk+0x250/0x9e0 block/genhd.c:618
loop_remove drivers/block/loop.c:2191 [inline]
loop_control_ioctl drivers/block/loop.c:2291 [inline]
loop_control_ioctl+0x40d/0x4f0 drivers/block/loop.c:2251
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:48 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:753 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:739 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:739
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&bdev->bd_mutex --> loop_ctl_mutex --> bdev_lookup_sem
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(bdev_lookup_sem);
lock(loop_ctl_mutex);
lock(bdev_lookup_sem);
lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by syz-executor104/8440:
#0: ffffffff8ca5f148 (loop_ctl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: loop_control_ioctl+0x7b/0x4f0 drivers/block/loop.c:2257
#1: ffffffff8c7d9430 (bdev_lookup_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: del_gendisk+0x222/0x9e0 block/genhd.c:616
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 8440 Comm: syz-executor104 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc6-next-20210409-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
dump_stack+0x141/0x1d7 lib/dump_stack.c:120
check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2129
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2938 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3676 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2a17/0x5230 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4902
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5512 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x740 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5477
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:949 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x139/0x1120 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1096
del_gendisk+0x250/0x9e0 block/genhd.c:618
loop_remove drivers/block/loop.c:2191 [inline]
loop_control_ioctl drivers/block/loop.c:2291 [inline]
loop_control_ioctl+0x40d/0x4f0 drivers/block/loop.c:2251
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:48 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:753 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:739 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:739
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x43ee49
Code: 28 c3 e8 2a 14 00 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fff4d86c238 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000400488 RCX: 000000000043ee49
RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000004c81 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 0000000000402e30 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000400488
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000402ec0
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00000000004ac018 R15: 0000000000400488
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection
syzbot can test patches for this issue, for details see:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists